What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0

Going on an international trip. I am downloading all the case law I can find about AI and copyright law so I can give the most informed take I can about "how does generative AI affect FOSS projects going forward?"

I'm going to focus on US case law first, including reading the recent high profile case that the US Supreme Court declined, but also the US Copyright Office's current analysis.

This is important, I think, because right now FOSS projects are moving fast to incorporate, but without anyone really knowing what the outcome will be, there's a great chance that, even on licensing grounds alone, we could be creating a huge mess for FOSS projects.

And (unfortunately?) my background in having done FOSS licensing stuff previously as part of my dayjob might mean I can do a pretty good job summarizing. Let's see!

If you have case law you think I should read, put it in this thread.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
0

@MisterOpenData Gibt es eine offizielle API oder einen Datensatz, der sich regelmรครŸig aktualisiert, mit dem ich die Feiertage oder Schulferien von Schleswig-Holstein oder am liebsten von jedem Bundesland erhalten kann?
Ich weiรŸ, dass es viele private Anbieter gibt, aber ich habe keine offizielle, maschinenlesbare Quelle gefunden. Gibt es da etwas?

0

Drodzy, musimy siฤ™ Wam czymล› pochwaliฤ‡! ๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰

Wล‚aล›nie zdobyliล›my grant 46 000 PLN na rozwรณj Rentgendroida โ€“ narzฤ™dzia do analizy i audytu prywatnoล›ci aplikacji mobilnych.

Dziฤ™ki niemu kaลผdy bฤ™dzie mรณgล‚ sprawdziฤ‡ i przeanalizowaฤ‡ aplikacje bez zaplecza technicznego i podejmowaฤ‡ bardziej ล›wiadome decyzje.

Wierzymy, ลผe prywatnoล›ฤ‡ nie powinna wymagaฤ‡ doktoratu z informatyki.

Z tego miejsca dziฤ™kujemy wszystkim, ktรณrzy przyczynili siฤ™ do tego sukcesu! ๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›

Zespรณล‚ fundacji ICD wraz z wolontariuszami UX. Agnieszka, Arek i Kuba trzymajฤ… czek na 46 000 PLN.

Fot. Karolina Szczepockaลปรณล‚te tล‚o z biaล‚ym banerem z hasล‚em "dbanie o prywatnoล›ฤ‡ bez doktoratu z informatyki".
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

RE: mastodon.social/@glyph/1162204

The thing that would ameliorate my daily crash-outs is not so much a dozen enthusiasts posting "that's it I'm done with AI" but to have a single one post something like "in my considered opinion the risks *are* worth it, but I recognize that they exist, and here's the safety protocol I use to make sure it's not getting the better of me".

0

Search Timeใœใ‚“ใœใ‚“่ˆˆๅ‘ณใชใ‹ใฃใŸใ‚“ใ ใ‘ใฉใ€ใฉใ†ใ‚‚ๆ—ฅไป˜ใŒdd.mm.yyyyๅฝขๅผใซใชใฃใฆใ‚‹ใ‚‰ใ—ใ„ใฎใ‚’่ฆ‹ใ‹ใ‘ใŸใ‚ˆใ€‚ใƒจใƒผใƒญใƒƒใƒ‘็™บ็ฅฅใ ใญใˆw

0
0
0
0
0
0

Drodzy, musimy siฤ™ Wam czymล› pochwaliฤ‡! ๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰๐ŸŽ‰

Wล‚aล›nie zdobyliล›my grant 46 000 PLN na rozwรณj Rentgendroida โ€“ narzฤ™dzia do analizy i audytu prywatnoล›ci aplikacji mobilnych.

Dziฤ™ki niemu kaลผdy bฤ™dzie mรณgล‚ sprawdziฤ‡ i przeanalizowaฤ‡ aplikacje bez zaplecza technicznego i podejmowaฤ‡ bardziej ล›wiadome decyzje.

Wierzymy, ลผe prywatnoล›ฤ‡ nie powinna wymagaฤ‡ doktoratu z informatyki.

Z tego miejsca dziฤ™kujemy wszystkim, ktรณrzy przyczynili siฤ™ do tego sukcesu! ๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›๐Ÿ’›

Zespรณล‚ fundacji ICD wraz z wolontariuszami UX. Agnieszka, Arek i Kuba trzymajฤ… czek na 46 000 PLN.

Fot. Karolina Szczepockaลปรณล‚te tล‚o z biaล‚ym banerem z hasล‚em "dbanie o prywatnoล›ฤ‡ bez doktoratu z informatyki".
0

Buckle your seat belts. Someone just tried to pull one hell of a scam on me.

It began with an email I received on March 2nd. The email was from RB (name withheld), an editor at Pan MacMillan in the UK. She began by referencing a specific and somewhat obscure story thread from my one year run on writing Birds of Prey for DC Comics.

She went on to sing my praises, talk about interest in the Jem memoir, and mentioned many other highly specific works and aspects of my career. She talked about how my work might align with Pan MacMillanโ€™s graphic novel and non-fiction catalogues. The final kicker was when she ended the email with a friendly quip about the number of my cats, something Iโ€™d just written about on my MoggyBlog FB page.

I was fairly stunned, not by the praise, but the extreme detail and specificity of the approach. Iโ€™ve seen plenty of samples of scams sent to authors that are always a bit vague and might mention one book title at most. This went way beyond that.

Which is why I failed to do the absolute number one smart thing I would normally have done โ€“ I didnโ€™t look closely at her email address. I saw that it said macmillan and left it at that. I did look her up on the Pan MacMillan website and saw that she was a real person.

We exchanged a couple of emails and she strongly wanted me to have a literary agent. Iโ€™ve never needed one in the past and have always operated with only my entertainment agent. She was quite insistent that I needed one and recommended an agent named CD (name withheld) as someone she had worked with closely and had the right sensibility for my background. She gave me a personal email address for him, to โ€œensure he prioritizes your messageโ€.

I checked out this agent and saw, once again, that he existed and was with a reputable UK agency. I found that the agency had a couple of co-agent associations with agencies in the US, including one I knew, the Howard Morhaim Agency. He looked legit.

So I did the thing -- wrote him an introductory email, and weโ€™ve been exchanging a daily email every day for the past week, including on weekends. He was all about my โ€œlegacyโ€. We discussed specific projects, and he relentlessly pushed me to get something called a Dynamic QR code to create a Digital Authorโ€™s Bridge. I had never heard of such a thing, was only familiar with regular old static QR codes. We went back and forth on it a lot until I finally understood what he was talking about. It sounded like a good idea, but when I researched them, I found they were rather pricey to obtain and maintain.

I wanted more info on what his agency contract would include, what his commissions were, how he handled ancillary rights, the usual business items I would naturally want to know. He kept on about the QR code. His relentless push on the QR code is when I began to suspect something was off about this whole situation.

I pushed back harder and he finally gave a minimal amount of info on commissions, and kept pushing about the QR code. He insisted that we had to put that in place BEFORE signing a contract, or as he called it, a Letter of Engagement.

By now, the many little red flags grew into a Big Red Flag. Had I paid more attention to the fake email address in the very first message, that would have been a Big Red Flag right there, but I missed it. Mucho stupid on my part.

The red flags piled up:
โ€ข RED FLAG: insistence on doing this QR code before signing a contract.
โ€ข RED FLAG: not providing standard agent information about a contract or even wanting to discuss it.
โ€ข RED FLAG: the fact that the layout, structure, and phrasing of his emails were extremely similar to the RB emails, right down to the constant use of 3-bullet points as selling points.
โ€ข RED FLAG: a total lack of feedback to a creative project I proposed and instead simply accepting it without comment. No agent worth his salt is going to accept a quarter-page pitch without having feedback, opinions, wanting to know more, etc.
โ€ข RED FLAG: the constant push-push-push to get this blasted QR code before anything else.
โ€ข RED FLAG: ending nearly every email with the promise of a โ€œglobal roll-outโ€. Of what? I had yet to write any of the things we were discussing.

When I began looking over the exchanges from the beginning, it seemed unlikely to me that โ€œRBโ€ would have done such a deep, deep dive into my work and background to include the specifics she did, not to mention reading my MoggyBlog. I mean, sure, itโ€™s flattering, and it massages my ego, but Iโ€™m realistic.

Which left the notion that all or much of this was created using an LLM. If so, itโ€™s the most nuanced one Iโ€™ve seen. It would have had to scour the internet for references to my work, such as articles, reviews, interviews, my amazon author page, and so on, then compiled it into a convincing email without including hallucinations or false references. If so, it represents a huge advance in the ability to scam authors and is therefore a significant threat.

If not, if it done by a person(s), they sure put one hell of a lot of effort into it.

During this process, I consulted with Victoria Strauss of Writer Beware. She gave me the official email for CD. I sent him an email in which I forwarded one of the last messages from โ€œhimโ€ with a query. I received an automated reply that he was at London Book Fair and out of touch for email. The reply included the name of a colleague, so I sent the same email to her. She confirmed that the messages did not come from CD and appreciated that I brought it to their attention.

Iโ€™m trying to get a valid contact for RB, so I can warn her as well.

Meanwhile, fake CDโ€™s next message went on about how his QR code set-up was so much better than other sites because it was free and permanent. RED FLAG. And it would integrate straight into my Amazon store to my authorโ€™s page. RED FLAG. And for the umpteenth time, he ended with a variation of โ€œOnce we have this simple link live, we can sign the formal agreement and get the global rollout moving immediately.โ€ RED FLAG.

I played this out a bit longer, very carefully, because I couldnโ€™t figure out what the ultimate scam was here. However, the mention of amazon store integration made me wonder whether I even had an amazon store.

I have a page that lists all my books. I donโ€™t know whether thatโ€™s actually a store. I certainly donโ€™t make any money off it, but I guess itโ€™s meant to be my โ€œstoreโ€.

Looking at my authorโ€™s bio on the amazon store, I suddenly realized that the reference to the number of cats was actually pulled from there, NOT from my MoggyBlog. By a bizarre coincidence, at the time I wrote that bio I mentioned a sixth cat possibly joining the horde. And very recently, I wrote almost exactly the same thing in the present. Different cats, different places, but so alike that itโ€™s no wonder I assumed RB was speaking of my present situation, not the past.

I wrote that bio in 2018 shortly before the fire. After the fire and losing everything, being homeless and whatnot, I completely forgot this page and bio even existed. I havenโ€™t looked at it since then.

I see where much of what was referenced came from there, including an off-hand comment about a ridge from RB that had puzzled me. In the bio I mentioned we lived on a volcanic ridge. That clinched that the material in RBโ€™s emails was drawn from this seven-year-old bio on amazon, treating it as current.

The last email from the hoaxer is again about tying a QR code to my amazon store. All this effort is to gain control of my amazon store? To do what, create a horde of fake AI books with my name on them? To steal digital assets from me? Those are the best guesses I can make.

I sent an email today that will show the hoaxer Iโ€™m aware of the scam. Weโ€™ll see whether they bother to respond.

Iโ€™m posting this in detail to alert other authors and to lay out how the scam has proceeded. I would love to hear from anyone that has had a similar scam run on them. Take care out there.

Please spread this far and wide.

0
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0

I'm trying to take care of a household of 6 people, only two of who can work right now, and with my longterm illness (I was bedridden for 16 months) I'm not able to cover all my bills this month, as a bunch of unexpected costs hit right in a row.
(my rent was covered with last week's post, thanks so much! I've still got storage, car, and electric to cover)

If you've can donate any amount at all, it'd really help. Thanks so much.

ko-fi.com/fooneturing

0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0

๐Ÿ• 2026-03-13 18:00 UTC

๐Ÿ“ฐ ใƒ—ใƒญใ‚ฐใƒฉใƒžใฎๆŠฑใ„ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ไธๅ‹•็”ฃใƒ‡ใƒผใ‚ฟใซใคใ„ใฆใฎ่ชค่ฌฌ (๐Ÿ‘ 91)

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Common programmer misconceptions about real estate data modeling, especially building addresses and registry dataโ€”a homage to "Falsehoods About Names"
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท ๋ถ€๋™์‚ฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋ง์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋ž˜๋จธ์˜ ํ”ํ•œ ์˜คํ•ด๋“ค - ๊ฑด๋ฌผ ์ฃผ์†Œ์™€ ๋“ฑ๊ธฐ๋ถ€ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์œผ๋กœ ("์ด๋ฆ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜ค๋ฅ˜" ์˜ค๋งˆ์ฃผ)

๐Ÿ”— zenn.dev/estie/articles/39efe1

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0