Hackers' Pub이란?

Hackers' Pub은 소프트웨어 프로그래머들이 지식과 경험을 서로 나누는 곳입니다. 또한 ActivityPub을 지원하는 소셜 네트워크이기도 하며, 연합우주(fediverse)에서 즐겨찾는 소프트웨어 프로그래머들을 팔로하고 최신 콘텐츠를 받아 볼 수 있습니다.

이 편지는 미래에서 최초로 시작되어 -1년에 한 바퀴 돌면서 받는 사람에게 행운을 주었고 지금은 당신에게로 옮겨진 이 편지는 -4일 안에 당신 곁을 떠나야 합니다. 영국에서 did:plc:ppk763j7o2wkinvzuqx4orrb이라는 사람은 2026년에 이 편지를 받았습니다. 어쩌고

0
0
0
0

I terestingbthread and replies.

I think that Apple’s incentives are just not aligned with developers in niche segments - purely a matter of scaling and managing the teams.

In most cases open source alternatives are vastly better.

But the question remains, how can you finance the maintenance and evolution in the long term - volunteer work is not sustainable.

It is remarkable that after 25 years we still haven’t found a viable and scalable funding model for this.
mastodon.social/@krzyzanowskim

0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1

「コミケ 熱中症」で検索しても熱中症になったという投稿が見当たらず大丈夫なのかなと思っていましたが、熱中症になったらそもそも今のタイミングで投稿することができないだけなのでは​:animuthinku:

0

Since 2008, my disillusionment with the actual existing market mechanisms we have, rather than the ones I wish we had, has (obviously?) been pretty intense. One of the reasons I like reading Matt Levine so much is that he is one of the few people who understands the actual mechanics of the market, believes it can be socially valuable, but is experiencing the same anguish I am that all the stewards of it have turned out to be not merely self-interested but basically just criminals in many cases.

0
1
0
0
1
1

맹점 테스트 재밌네. 애초에 우리 눈에 보이는 이미지가 완전한게 아니었음. 센싱되지 않는 영역이 있고 이 부분의 빈 공간은 뇌가 알아서 적당히 채워 그려넣고 빵꾸 없는 이미지로 만든 다음 인식 시키는 거였군. 생성형 ai 에 그림 주고 빈 공간 채워 달라는 거랑 똑같네.

0
0

Misskey開発のクラウドファンディング進捗です​:fidgeting_milkbeko:
予想を超えるご支援をいただいておりますが、今月いっぱいくらいで本クラファンは終わりにします
:arigunyatogonyainyasu:​​:arigunyatogonyainyasu:​​:arigunyatogonyainyasu:​​:arigunyatogonyainyasu:​​:arigunyatogonyainyasu:

目標: 100万円
現在: 約75万円(!)
リターン: Misskeyカードなどの特典

https://misskey-hub.net/ja/docs/donate/

Misskeyはフリーソフトなので収入は皆様からのごカンパが頼りです
:yawn_javasparrow:
よろしければご支援お願いいたします
:fidgeting_milkbeko:

ご支援金がどのように活用されるかについてはこちら!

0
1
0
1

nogajun🍉 님이 아래 게시글을 공유했습니다:

“燃えない電池”へ一歩前進。中国ベンチャー、リチウム電池火災を封じる技術で資金調達

電池火災の消火技術を開発するスタートアップ「鋰泰新能源(Litai New Energy)」がこのほど、中科創星([…]

더 읽기 →
0

Dumb question that I was always too afraid to ask:

I know how the #Fediverse and its federation works. It's intuitive and familiar to me; I mean, I even host my own instance.

But I never understood how interaction cross-software is supposed to work. In theory, I can use whatever #ActivityPub software I want and still interact with everyone else. But in practice that just... isn't the case, right?

I mean, for text it's quite simple: I write a short post on #Mastodon and people on #GoToSocial or #Misskey or whatever can see and read that same post and interact with it. They can see my profile and it appears on their instance in their style and with their features.

Even outside of microblogging I still get it. A super-long post on #Friendica or #Diaspora appears on my timeline, too. Their profiles might have more fields than I can see here, but that's fine.

But what's up beyond that?

I can see #Pixelfed posts here, converted into image galleries. But what about the other way 'round? If someone on Pixelfed follows my Mastodon account, they can't see any of my non-image posts, right?

What about #PeerTube and such niche software? I guess I could follow a PeerTube account as a microblogger and see their videos and descriptions in my timeline. Video comments are replies.

But the other way 'round? How are they supposed to interact with Friendica or Pixelfed users? PeerTube doesn't even have a "timeline".

Doesn't that feature disparity undermine the whole idea of the #Fediverse or am I missing something?

#AskFedi #FediAdmin

I am asking this because I caught myself thinking about making a Mastodon account for my PeerTube space, in the same way you used to make a Twitter presence for your YouTube channel.

I realised that I should be able to just use my PeerTube account instead, since it's ActivityPub. That's the whole appeal of the Fediverse!

But since I can't write text posts, read timelines or interact in any way with non-video content on PeerTube, where is the point in federating with the rest of ActivityPub?

Is it only for commenters to be able to use their existing Fedi accounts to comment on PeerTube, and it's more of a one-way thing in reality?

#PeerTube #Fediverse #Fedi #AskFedi

0
1
0

Dumb question that I was always too afraid to ask:

I know how the #Fediverse and its federation works. It's intuitive and familiar to me; I mean, I even host my own instance.

But I never understood how interaction cross-software is supposed to work. In theory, I can use whatever #ActivityPub software I want and still interact with everyone else. But in practice that just... isn't the case, right?

I mean, for text it's quite simple: I write a short post on #Mastodon and people on #GoToSocial or #Misskey or whatever can see and read that same post and interact with it. They can see my profile and it appears on their instance in their style and with their features.

Even outside of microblogging I still get it. A super-long post on #Friendica or #Diaspora appears on my timeline, too. Their profiles might have more fields than I can see here, but that's fine.

But what's up beyond that?

I can see #Pixelfed posts here, converted into image galleries. But what about the other way 'round? If someone on Pixelfed follows my Mastodon account, they can't see any of my non-image posts, right?

What about #PeerTube and such niche software? I guess I could follow a PeerTube account as a microblogger and see their videos and descriptions in my timeline. Video comments are replies.

But the other way 'round? How are they supposed to interact with Friendica or Pixelfed users? PeerTube doesn't even have a "timeline".

Doesn't that feature disparity undermine the whole idea of the #Fediverse or am I missing something?

#AskFedi #FediAdmin

0
0
1
1
0
1

뉴스 다이제스트 : 진짜 망할 것 같은 코닥

‘디카’ 만든 코닥, 디카에 무너져…이젠 생존 시험대◎횡설수설하는 '그록'에 머스크 해명, “그냥 멍청한 실수...챗봇은 이유 몰라”◎MS가 밝힌 윈도12와 그 이후의 미래…AI로 진화

just4fun.kr/post/2493

0
1
0

@pluralisticCory Doctorow Recently at work, a manager pushing AI was presenting the "great stats" of AI use, and presented a "24% prompt acceptance rate" as if that didn't mean "76% prompt failure rate", aka, it fucks up the vast majority of the time. Even in these cases, of the 24% of prompts that were "accepted", there were no stats for how much additional work was needed to get the "accepted" result into an actually acceptable state.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0