What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

:realtek: のオーディオは近年のデジタルオーディオの普及でデジタルアンプを積んだデバイスが多いので結果的に使わないから気にならないが、NICはWindowsでタグVLANのドライバ入れたらブルスク吐きまくったの、まだ忘れられない。

0
0
0
0
0
1

:realtek: のオーディオは近年のデジタルオーディオの普及でデジタルアンプを積んだデバイスが多いので結果的に使わないから気にならないが、NICはWindowsでタグVLANのドライバ入れたらブルスク吐きまくったの、まだ忘れられない。

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1

💾 4am AMD Xorg/Kernel Debugging 💾

Ongoing fun ongoes, so much so. This iteration receives triple output: tty video (Display Port), COM1 redirect via DB9 to laptop running minicom, COM2 to the usual BMC SoL terminal watched from ipmitool on adjacent laptop.

Coming up, rebooting into GENERIC-DEBUG kernel rebuilt with remote GDM (kgdb) access via the COM1 link to laptop.

monitor connected to desktop, showing Xorg session log during tty crash handler exitmonitor connected to desktop, with separate laptop connected to desktop via COM1 and COM2 serial links, as described in the post. color and contrast boosted for low light readability.
0
0
0
0

[속보] 중국 여객기, 김해공항에 남풍 불자 착륙 포기하고 김포로 회항 - 디지털타임스

dt.co.kr/contents.html?article

20여년전에 비슷한 상황에서 중국항공기가 김해공항 옆 산에 추락한 적 있으니 저럴만도 하지.

0
0
0
0
1
0

> 遠隔の第三者によって細工されたリクエストを送信された場合、任意のコードを実行されたり、サービス運用妨害(DoS)状態を引き起こされたりする可能性があります。

JVN#22348866: Active! mailにおけるスタックベースのバッファオーバーフローの脆弱性 : 👀
---
jvn.jp/jp/JVN22348866/index.ht

0
0
0

Z80はZilogという会社の製品です。
Intelの8080を大幅に拡張して便利な命令が多数搭載された8ビットCPUでした。
8ビットパソコンの時代の代表的CPUで、互換CPUも色々作られています。

ちなみに任天堂ゲームボーイのCPUもZ80(というよりは8080)から機能を大幅に削った独自のものが使われていましたね。

MSXturboRで搭載されたR800がZ80界(?)では最速クラスになるのかと思います。


QT: fedibird.com/@HayashiyaManpei/
[参照]

0
0
0
0
1
1
1

Z80はZilogという会社の製品です。
Intelの8080を大幅に拡張して便利な命令が多数搭載された8ビットCPUでした。
8ビットパソコンの時代の代表的CPUで、互換CPUも色々作られています。

ちなみに任天堂ゲームボーイのCPUもZ80(というよりは8080)から機能を大幅に削った独自のものが使われていましたね。

MSXturboRで搭載されたR800がZ80界(?)では最速クラスになるのかと思います。


QT: fedibird.com/@HayashiyaManpei/
[参照]

0
0

한국닌텐도 닌텐도 스위치 2 다음 2차 추첨은 5월 상순 예정

https://bbs.ruliweb.com/nin/board/300004/read/2331255

닌텐도 스위치 2 웬만하면 다 구할 수 있을것 같군요. 39곳 응모했는데 1곳은 될듯

0
0
0
0
0
0

Z80はZilogという会社の製品です。
Intelの8080を大幅に拡張して便利な命令が多数搭載された8ビットCPUでした。
8ビットパソコンの時代の代表的CPUで、互換CPUも色々作られています。

ちなみに任天堂ゲームボーイのCPUもZ80(というよりは8080)から機能を大幅に削った独自のものが使われていましたね。

MSXturboRで搭載されたR800がZ80界(?)では最速クラスになるのかと思います。


QT: fedibird.com/@HayashiyaManpei/
[参照]

0

When sharing a rapid news cycle, how do we share information that is validated and attributed?

"Speed of light" used to be the moniker for things "moving fast", e.g. "oh wow that happened at the speed of light".

It's worth mentioning that these days, especially with a never-pausing news cycle, there's something to be said for "moves at the speed of information".

e.g. The current news cycle in the United States right is paced at "the speed of information". When it feels like we're spreading Breaking News, or life saving information, it feels more urgent to spread the information than almost anything else.

This is a very "yes, and" sentiment!

Now is a great time to build a practice for how you can personally handle sharing things at the speed of information, which will have the double impact of making sure the information is 1 ) correct and 2 ) attributed.

When you see information you wish to share, esp if it's a news headline:

1. Do a quick search with your engine of choice ( :google: , :duckduckgo: )
2. Credit both sources

For # 2: this is because you have two sources, not one. *Your* sources are whatever post you saw that prompted your search *and* the results of the search.

Verifying in this way also has the double benefit of ensuring the original author is credited, which is doubly important for marginalized voices.

Let's use today's news about and the (labor data) for practice!

1. There's a :bluesky: post making rounds about DOGE + NLRB data
2. A quick search shows that the original source is an :npr: article by Jenna McLaughlin.

So that means when *I* post about it, my sources are: MattJay AND Jenna McLaughlin. *I* have *two* sources.

To capture this, I might make a post like:

There is a story breaking about gaining access to data! Sources are Jenna McLaughlin @ NPR:

npr.org/2025/04/15/nx-s1-53558

There is also additional analysis circulating by MattJay:

bsky.app/profile/mattjay.com/p

====

Posting like this:

1. Credits both sources
2. Fact checks and attributes
3. Isn't accusing

For # 3: It doesn't matter to my post what anyone else is or isn't doing. (And I would need to validate my own accusation.)

My only goals should be to validate and attribute what I wish to share.

0