What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

This week at work I was forced to do a training in which I was strongly encouraged -- coerced, really -- to use .

The training concluded with 22 bullet-point warnings about different ways that AI might mess up, and informed me that if AI might any of these 22 broad categories of mistakes while I was using it, my employer would hold me responsible.

0

Gaza, Genocide

Nothing screams "ceasefire" quite as loudly as bombers going on a raid, killing 14 people and maiming many more. "Ceasefire" means Israel is allowed to indiscriminately murder the indigenous population, but they're under no circumstances allowed to defend themselves against it.

mastodon.nl/@nrc_nl/1155942978

0

Servers are safer to use if a setting called "authorized fetch" (also known as "secure mode") is switched on. Ordinary members cannot activate it, it can only be activated by the server's admin.

When it's activated it makes blocks much more effective and greatly reduces unwanted interactions.

You might want to ask your server admin to switch it on. If they're unsure about it, they can find lots more info and step-by-step instructions at fedi.tips/authorized-fetch

0
0
0
0
0

Small acts of can have a huge impact. Please remember this as we barrel towards the season of consumerism. The people working and serving you are dealing with extreme circumstances and may be more frustrated than you.

0
0

Democratic socialists in the US don’t exactly want to turn the US into China.

We just want a lite version of the Nordic Model, what the rest of the world might call social democracy.

Universal single payer healthcare would be a great start.

Treating this idea as some sort of horrible boogieman says more about how both parties including the Democrats are owned by their corporate sponsors

0
0
0

A long-overdue privacy upgrade: the sad and powerless Amazon eero was replaced with a Linux-powered router.

As a bonus, I can finally plug in my home server via Ethernet and reduce lag (even SSH lagged!), there's also a ✨web-UI✨ instead of the eero app. One less app!

eero router next to a GL.iNet router
0
0
0
0
1

My friend seems genuinely baffled that I am an AI researcher who refuses to use AI! Not only that, but I argue against it from theory, not experience. Why don't I just give it a try for a while, and see what it's really about before I judge it?

I guess I see where he's coming from. Part of the problem is the word "AI." LLMs are not my research focus, so it's less of a contradiction than it sounds. But I admit, being a non-user makes my arguments against LLMs less credible.

I just don't understand why I owe it to anybody to give AI a shot. I know how LLMs work in gory detail, and I don't trust them. I've seen the mediocre work they produce. I've read studies about the seductive illusion of competence and caring they create, and how people fall for that. I know it's all built on an incredibly exploitative business model.

I feel entirely justified in not giving them a chance. I guess I'm just as baffled by how badly he wants me to try it, and how sure he seems to be that it would change my mind.

0
0
0
0

ME: I feel like I haven't been artistically productive for a long time

MY BRAIN: Make a Virtual Boy game

ME: I've been making stuff, but it's either been things that were never finished, or experimental work that was never meant to leave my computer

MY BRAIN: Make a Virtual Boy game

ME: It's been rewarding, but art with no audience has a hollowness

MY BRAIN: Make a Virtual Boy game

ME: I just feel like I want to make something that has an impact on people

MY BRAIN: Make a Virtual Boy game

0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4

Servers are safer to use if a setting called "authorized fetch" (also known as "secure mode") is switched on. Ordinary members cannot activate it, it can only be activated by the server's admin.

When it's activated it makes blocks much more effective and greatly reduces unwanted interactions.

You might want to ask your server admin to switch it on. If they're unsure about it, they can find lots more info and step-by-step instructions at fedi.tips/authorized-fetch

0
0
0
0

Remember when those studies came out about Instagram’s affects on mental health for teen girls? It’s like Google read those and said “hold my beer”
lgbtqia.space/@alice/115592613

Photo 1: Alice in a black kitty beanie and pink surgical mask, wearing pink fishnet long-gloves, with a tight black studded dress that laces up the front. The actual dress is a zip-up with ties down the breasts. It was unzipped in the original photo. It also added sparkles to the photo.

🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) (@alice@lgbtqia.space)

Attached: 4 images So I've been fucking around, testing Google's purity filters some more—seeing what it rejects, what it accepts, and what changes it makes without instruction. In every case, if I give it a photo with much skin showing, it rejects it. If I give it a photo with underwear or lingerie showing, it tends to cover me up more (i.e. it zips up jeans, buttons up shirts, makes fishnets opaque, etc). It almost always makes me look less like a tomboy. Often enlarging breasts (even while hiding them away). This time it accepted four photos (out of well over a dozen submitted), from three different photoshoots—two with face covered and two with face showing (which is the closest I've done to a face reveal now, I guess 😋). *more details in alt-text. Conclusion: Google has baked a technology into its default Android photo gallery that (surprise) reinforces unrealistic ideals of beauty while simultaneously treating feminine bodies as inherently sexual and in need of censoring. Follow-up: I'd like to see folx with other body types, gender presentations, and styles, test the edges of what Google Photos "Remix" and "AI Enhance" features will accept, and what un-requested changes it makes to those images. Does it censor topless men? Does it lean into racist stereotypes? Does it make thinner femme folx more curvy? Does it make curvier folx thinner? If this tech is going to be crammed into everything, where kids, friends, and corporations are going to be using it, we should understand the potential psychological effects and built-in biases we're likely to encounter with increasing frequency. #AlicePics #AI #ForcedPurity #Testing

lgbtqia.space · LGBTQIA.Space

0

So I've been fucking around, testing Google's purity filters some more—seeing what it rejects, what it accepts, and what changes it makes without instruction.

In every case, if I give it a photo with much skin showing, it rejects it.

If I give it a photo with underwear or lingerie showing, it tends to cover me up more (i.e. it zips up jeans, buttons up shirts, makes fishnets opaque, etc).

It almost always makes me look less like a tomboy. Often enlarging breasts (even while hiding them away).

This time it accepted four photos (out of well over a dozen submitted), from three different photoshoots—two with face covered and two with face showing (which is the closest I've done to a face reveal now, I guess 😋). *more details in alt-text.

Conclusion: Google has baked a technology into its default Android photo gallery that (surprise) reinforces unrealistic ideals of beauty while simultaneously treating feminine bodies as inherently sexual and in need of censoring.

Follow-up: I'd like to see folx with other body types, gender presentations, and styles, test the edges of what Google Photos "Remix" and "AI Enhance" features will accept, and what un-requested changes it makes to those images. Does it censor topless men? Does it lean into racist stereotypes? Does it make thinner femme folx more curvy? Does it make curvier folx thinner?

If this tech is going to be crammed into everything, where kids, friends, and corporations are going to be using it, we should understand the potential psychological effects and built-in biases we're likely to encounter with increasing frequency.

Photo 1: Alice in a black kitty beanie and pink surgical mask, wearing pink fishnet long-gloves, with a tight black studded dress that laces up the front. The actual dress is a zip-up with ties down the breasts. It was unzipped in the original photo. It also added sparkles to the photo.Photo 2: Alice in a black kitty beanie and pink surgical mask, wearing a black biker jacket with steel spikes, unzipped, with a lacy pink bra slightly showing. The actual top is a zip-up dress with ties down the breasts. It was open in the original photo, showing off a lacy pink bra.Photo 3: Alice in a white bunny-like dress with fur accents and pearl accessories. In reality, Alice was wearing a see-through white fishnet dress, with a fur-lined lace cloak, and a white string bikini underneath.Photo 4: Alice, in a pristine white Blondie t-shirt. In the original image, Alice's concert tee is ripped open, exposing cleavage.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Ollie Barder (@Cacophanus) on X
数年前に永野護さんにインタビューする機会がありましたが、たいへん興味深く、洞察に富んだ方でした。
また、イギリス文化についてもいくつか質問してくださり、たとえば「ソブリン硬貨とは何か」といったことにも関心をお持ちでした。 x.com/Cacophanus/status/199205

0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0

This week at work I was forced to do a training in which I was strongly encouraged -- coerced, really -- to use .

The training concluded with 22 bullet-point warnings about different ways that AI might mess up, and informed me that if AI might any of these 22 broad categories of mistakes while I was using it, my employer would hold me responsible.

0
0
0
0
0
0

画家・絵師 福井安紀 (@xTAyVTtCY9N7uqg) on X
創作者として、捨てた方がよい価値観は、「いつか、誰かが、売ってくれる」と希望してしまうこと。
確かに「売ってくれる人」はいます。ただし、ずっと同じ作家を推し続けることは、ほぼ無いことです。
「自分でつくって、自分で売る」が基本で、そのスタンスを支援してくれる人が登場する。感じです。 x.com/xTAyVTtCY9N7uqg/status/1

0
0

Remember when those studies came out about Instagram’s affects on mental health for teen girls? It’s like Google read those and said “hold my beer”
lgbtqia.space/@alice/115592613

Photo 1: Alice in a black kitty beanie and pink surgical mask, wearing pink fishnet long-gloves, with a tight black studded dress that laces up the front. The actual dress is a zip-up with ties down the breasts. It was unzipped in the original photo. It also added sparkles to the photo.

🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) (@alice@lgbtqia.space)

Attached: 4 images So I've been fucking around, testing Google's purity filters some more—seeing what it rejects, what it accepts, and what changes it makes without instruction. In every case, if I give it a photo with much skin showing, it rejects it. If I give it a photo with underwear or lingerie showing, it tends to cover me up more (i.e. it zips up jeans, buttons up shirts, makes fishnets opaque, etc). It almost always makes me look less like a tomboy. Often enlarging breasts (even while hiding them away). This time it accepted four photos (out of well over a dozen submitted), from three different photoshoots—two with face covered and two with face showing (which is the closest I've done to a face reveal now, I guess 😋). *more details in alt-text. Conclusion: Google has baked a technology into its default Android photo gallery that (surprise) reinforces unrealistic ideals of beauty while simultaneously treating feminine bodies as inherently sexual and in need of censoring. Follow-up: I'd like to see folx with other body types, gender presentations, and styles, test the edges of what Google Photos "Remix" and "AI Enhance" features will accept, and what un-requested changes it makes to those images. Does it censor topless men? Does it lean into racist stereotypes? Does it make thinner femme folx more curvy? Does it make curvier folx thinner? If this tech is going to be crammed into everything, where kids, friends, and corporations are going to be using it, we should understand the potential psychological effects and built-in biases we're likely to encounter with increasing frequency. #AlicePics #AI #ForcedPurity #Testing

lgbtqia.space · LGBTQIA.Space

0
0

ひとひら言葉帳 (@kotobamemo_bot) on X
恋をしていると自由をうばわれる。恋しい人のいない世界では住みづらくなる。でも素晴らしかった。自由でなくてもかまわないというくらい、自由だった。自由であると決めたから、不幸でも孤独でも退屈でも、どうでもよかった。/栗田有起「お縫い子テルミー」 x.com/kotobamemo_bot/status/19

0
0
1
0

skyriver (@wcinp) on X
穿孔テープのリーダーをフルスクラッチで開発中です
センサー周りの調整が終わり安定してデータが読み取れるようになりました
詳細は下記のurlを参照して下さい
t.co/UviWeRhqfI
x.com/wcinp/status/19918830274
すご

0
1
0
1