What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
0
0
0

weird little personal/medical life update

I donated a kidney on Wednesday! I got home from the hospital yesterday and am doing great.

I donated anonymously so I don't know who the recipient is, but I was told the kidney started working immediately and they are doing well too.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

팔란티어, 美 ICE 추방작전 핵심으로 부상… CEO “이민 통제는 진보적 가치” 데이터 분석 기업 팔란티어가 미국 이민세관단속국(ICE)의 대규모 추방작전을 위한 핵심 기술 제공자로 부상했다. 3일(현지 시각) 워싱턴포스트에 따르면 팔란티어의 소프트웨어 '이민 라이프사이클 운영 시스템'이 불법 체류자 추적·식별·추방 절차 전반에 투입되면서 트럼프 대통령이 강화한 대량 추방 기조의 중추적 역할을 하고 있는 것으로 나타났다.

팔란티어, 美 ICE 추방작전 핵심으로 부상… CEO ...

0

팔란티어, 美 ICE 추방작전 핵심으로 부상… CEO “이민 통제는 진보적 가치”

데이터 분석 기업 팔란티어가 미국 이민세관단속국(ICE)의 대규모 추방작전을 위한 핵심 기술 제공자로 부상했다. 3일(현지 시각) 워싱턴포스트에 따르면 팔란티어의 소프트웨어 '이민 라이프사이클 운영 시스템'이 불법 체류자 추적·식별·추방 절차 전반에 투입되면서 트럼프 대통령이 강화한 대량 추방 기조의 중추적 역할을 하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. biz.chosun.com/international/i

0
0
0

@inthehandsPaul Cantrell The feds will pull an inside job soon enough, I reckon. Or ICE'll accidentally shoot one another, as the Guard did in Detroit decades ago. Or one of them will have a heart attack and drop dead, and the feds will blame something something. Or one of their cars will blow up, and the feds will claim civilian sabotage. They have several options.

0
1

The following .gov domains have been registered in the past 24 hours:
andersontn911.gov
brewertonfiredistrict.gov
cityofhighlandar.gov
cityofisleton.gov
eastbrunswicknj.gov
fwbpolice.gov
hillcountymt.gov
mercedcounty.gov
ndclimbs.gov
ndsavin.gov
nwojdcoh.gov
parkesburg.gov
parkesburgpolice.gov
parkinar.gov
sanitarydistrict6tohny.gov
townofgainesvilleny.gov
tuscumbiavillagemo.gov
upperbrookville.gov
washingtonny.gov
willingny.gov
wyostabletoken.gov

0

You know how to get people to leave platforms run by evil people?

Yes, that's right, by offering better alternatives and being super friendly and welcoming and actively working on recruiting people and evangelizing for the better platforms and most importantly by not being chastizing and gatekeeping misers.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Thread on indexes and indexing.
(starting with reposts)

Never Index Your Own Book
(Kurt Vonnegut Cat's Cradle, ch 55)

"It appeared that Claire Minton, in her time, had been a professional indexer. I had never heard of such a profession before.
She told me that she had put her husband through college years before with her earnings as an indexer, that the earnings had been good, and that few people could index well.
She said that indexing was a thing that only the most amateurish author undertook to do for his own book. I asked her what she thought of Philip Castle’s job.
“Flattering to the author, insulting to the reader,” she said. “In a hyphenated word,” she observed, with the shrewd amiability of an expert, “ ‘self-indulgent.’ I’m always embarrassed when I see an index an author has made of his own work.”
“Embarrassed?”
“It’s a revealing thing, an author’s index of his own work,” she informed me. “It’s a shameless exhibition—to the trained eye.”
“She can read character from an index,” said her husband.
“Oh?” I said. “What can you tell about Philip Castle?”
She smiled faintly. “Things I’d better not tell strangers.”
catscradle.neocities.org/chapt

0
0
0
0
0
0

My preference would still be for the final writeup for this result to be primarily human-generated in the most essential portions of the paper, though I can see a case for delegating routine proofs to some combination of AI-generated text and Lean code. But to me, the more interesting capability revealed by these events is the ability to rapidly write and rewrite new versions of a text as needed, even if one was not the original author of the argument.

This is sharp contrast to existing practice where the effort required to produce even one readable manuscript is quite time-consuming, and subsequent revisions (in response to referee reports, for instance) are largely confined to local changes (e.g., modifying the proof of a single lemma), with large-scale reworking of the paper often avoided due both to the work required and the large possibility of introducing new errors. However, the combination of reasonably competent AI text generation and modification capabilities, paired with the ability of formal proof assistants to verify the informal arguments thus generated, allows for a much more dynamic and high-multiplicity conception of what a writeup of an argument is, with the ability for individual participants to rapidly create tailored expositions of the argument at whatever level of rigor and precision is desired.

Presumably one would still want to have a singular "official" paper artefact that is held to the highest standards of writing; but this primary paper could now be accompanied by a large number of secondary alternate versions of the paper that may be somewhat looser and AI-generated in nature, but could hold additional value beyond the primary document. (5/5)

Addendum: as portions of my text above have been quoted out of context, I would like to also draw attention to the various caveats listed at github.com/teorth/erdosproblem regarding the extent to which one can draw broader conclusions about AI mathematics capabilities from the progress in solving Erdos problems.

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0