What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
0
0

RE: g0v.social/@wancw/115916936780

其實在職場,我也常當那種雞婆的人。

「這邊可以用什麼什麼功能,比較有效率」

「有 xxx 工具,可以節省你的時間」

然後發現很多人根本改不了既有的工作模式,或是根本不在乎(反正又不會加薪什麼的)。我就閉嘴了。 🤷

0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0

Trump and his entire Cabinet need to be impeached, prosecuted, convicted and sent to prison for the rest of their lives.

Army reservist says his wife, a Venezuelan, has been held in detention for weeks share.google/SLoJwJKSLgxSi9A7t

0
1

Just realized something. Nutrition labels were put on food to help educate folks as yo what they're eating. It helped normal people understand basic nutrition values in their food. This was one step to educating the public.

I just realized I want an Internet Privacy Label. When I go to sign up for a service you have to list out in detail every single way you sell my data and who to. I don't want legalese. I want a LIST.

Maybe once people see the long list they'll start taking this more seriously?

Anyone know if anything like this exists or is in the works?

0
1
1
0
0
0

개발이라는 건...

식당 메뉴를 전채부터 후식까지 다 준비해놓고 자리 여분까지 싹 남겨놓았는데

막상 손님이 와서 자리잡고서는
여기 화장실 어디에요? 하고 물으면

식당이 전부 불타버린다는 이야기가 제일 웃겼음

0
0

A thought that popped into my head when I woke up at 4 am and couldn’t get back to sleep…

Imagine that AI/LLM tools were being marketed to workers as a way to do the same work more quickly and work fewer hours without telling their employers.

“Use ChatGPT to write your TPS reports, go home at lunchtime. Spend more time with your kids!” “Use Claude to write your code, turn 60-hour weeks into four-day weekends!” “Collect two paychecks by using AI! You can hold two jobs without the boss knowing the difference!”

Imagine if AI/LLM tools were not shareholder catnip, but a grassroots movement of tooling that workers were sharing with each other to work less. Same quality of output, but instead of being pushed top-down, being adopted to empower people to work less and “cheat” employers.

Imagine if unions were arguing for the right of workers to use LLMs as labor saving devices, instead of trying to protect members from their damage.

CEOs would be screaming bloody murder. There’d be an overnight industry in AI-detection tools and immediate bans on AI in the workplace. Instead of Microsoft CoPilot 365, Satya would be out promoting Microsoft SlopGuard - add ons that detect LLM tools running on Windows and prevent AI scrapers from harvesting your company’s valuable content for training.

The media would be running horror stories about the terrible trend of workers getting the same pay for working less, and the awful quality of LLM output. Maybe they’d still call them “hallucinations,” but it’d be in the terrified tone of 80s anti-drug PSAs.

What I’m trying to say in my sleep-deprived state is that you shouldn’t ignore the intent and ill effects of these tools. If they were good for you, shareholders would hate them.

You should understand that they’re anti-worker and anti-human. TPTB would be fighting them tooth and nail if their benefits were reversed. It doesn’t matter how good they get, or how interesting they are: the ultimate purpose of the industry behind them is to create less demand for labor and aggregate more wealth in fewer hands.

Unless you happen to be in a very very small club of ultra-wealthy tech bros, they’re not for you, they’re against you.

0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0

"In a creative market dominated by five publishers, four studios, three labels, two mobile app stores, and a single company that controls all the ebooks and audiobooks, giving a creative worker extra rights to bargain with is like giving your bullied kid more lunch money...Creative workers who cheer on lawsuits by the big studios and labels need to remember the first rule of class warfare: things that are good for your boss are rarely what’s good for you.

"The fact that every AI-created work is in the public domain means that if Getty or Disney...or Hearst newspapers use AI to generate works – then anyone else can take those works, copy them, sell them or give them away for nothing. And the only thing those companies hate more than paying creative workers, is having other people take their stuff without permission.
The US Copyright Office’s position means that the only way these companies can get a copyright is to pay humans to do creative work."

0
0
1
1
0

서양에는 '사람의 도리'라는 개념이 없어서... 유교의 특징 중 하나가 절대자 없이 인간을 정의했다는 건데 쟤넨 그런게 없고 그냥 인간으로 태어난 것 자체가 지맘대로 환경, 동물 등 비인간을 마구 짓밟을 수 있는 특권을 신에게 받았다고 생각¹하기 때문에 이런 말을 절대 이해 못하죠ㅠㅠ 1: 물론 쟤들한테 직접 물어보면 저런 워딩은 안 쓰겠지만 그러는데 거리낌이 없음

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:y5csbf6vxv6d2jwp7r5jkx3n/post/3mcnzww5ooc26

0
0

<그것이 알고싶다> 수탉 편을 보고 오는 길입니다. 사건에 관해 매우 상세히 다루고 있으며, 피해자의 목소리도 많이 담긴 회차입니다. 유튜버 수탉을 살해하고자 한 가해자가 그알 제작진에게 보낸 마지막 편지가 정말 가관입니다. 그알이 ‘인생은 실전이야 존만아’라는 말을 하는 건 처음 봅니다.

0
0
0
1
0
1