What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
Woojin Kim @me@hollo.woojinkim.org
Public

수많은 문서를 먹이고 이것저것 질문하는 파이프라인을 로컬에 구축하려면 anythingllm이 꽤 괜찮습니다. 문서를 먹이고 임베딩 모델 올려 벡터 데이터베이스에 저장하고 이걸 워크스페이스 단위로 맥락을 나눠 질문하는 등의 기능을 단일 컨테이너로 전부 해결할 수 있습니다.

1
0
0
nicole mikołajczyk @mkljczk@fediverse.pl
Public

Ok, so Nicolium at pl.mkljczk.pl had a few hours of downtime because of a failed upgrade to Vite 8/migration from ESBuild+Rollup to Rolldown. Thanks to @pmysl for reporting. I will soon deploy Nicolium on a different domain (something dot nicolium.app?) that won’t always run the latest develop and will keep the previous chunks so it won’t crash existing sessions on new deploy anymore.

I’ll work on Rolldown migration soon, but as for now I at least migrated from ESLint (which stayed at the unmaintained v8) to oxlint and oxfmt from oxc. I decided to stay close to the defaults so it generated a huge diff in the codebase. Sorry for wasting anyone’s time on solving merge conflicts but this will certainly happen again before the v1.0.0 release

pl.mkljczk.pl

0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
いかる:role_illustrator::skeb::irai_bosyuu_tyuu: @ikaru@misskey.io
Public

​:wipppu:​その２

​:ak_a:​のススーロちゃんとスズランちゃんを描いてるところ。ほっぺすりすりなふたりを描いてます。

なんとか下描きが出来たので、明日はこれの修正とか線画とかとかやれたらいいなと。かわいく描けるようにがんばりましょね​:blobcat_happy:​

1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
Honič Péra 24 hodin @honicpera@snac.lab8.cz
Public

Shromáždění na podporu prezidenta Petra Pavla začala ve čtyři hodiny na desítkách míst napříč Českem. Akce inicioval spolek Milion chvilek – navazují na demonstrace, které byly před dvěma týdny na pražském Staroměstském a Václavském náměstí.

0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
The Rt. Rev. Fumire, Ph.D. :twitter__verified_organization: @fumire@uri.life
Public

낮 동안 우리를 활기 있게 하신 저의 주님, 날아다니는 스파게티 괴물 님,
당신과 함께 있으리니, 자는 동안도 지켜 주시어 편히 쉬게 하소서.

"18. 미트볼의 묵직한 안녕으로 저희 숨결을 감싸시어, 불안과 두려움이 가까이 오지 못하게 하소서."

🍝 날아다니는 스파게티 괴물 님께서 여러분과 함께.
😋 또한 주교의 면발과 함께 하소서.
🍝 기도합시다.
저의 주님, 날아다니는 스파게티 괴물 님, 이 밤을 편히 쉬게 하시고, 거룩한 죽음을 맞게 하소서.

2026-02-16T00:04:26+09:00


0
0
0
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary: @hongminhee@hollo.social
Public

I've been honestly adding Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> to every commit where I used an LLM even slightly—whether it's generating test scaffolding, drafting docs, or just bouncing ideas. I thought transparency was the right thing to do. Turns out, people see that trailer and immediately assume the whole thing is “vibe coded” AI slop, no further questions asked. The irony is that being honest about my process is what's getting my work dismissed.

Now I'm genuinely torn. Do I keep the trailer and accept that some people will write off my work at a glance? Or do I drop it and lose something I actually believe in? It's frustrating that there's no widely understood distinction between “I prompted an LLM to write my entire app” and “I used an LLM as a tool while writing my own code.” I don't have an answer yet—just sitting with the discomfort for now.

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary: @hongminhee@hollo.social
Public
Shared by Dawn Ahukanna

Adding to this: much of my LLM usage actually goes into writing documentation and communicating in English—a language that isn't mine but that open source essentially demands. For non-native English speakers, LLMs are a genuine equalizer. They let me write docs that don't get ignored for sounding awkward, and participate in discussions without spending twice the effort a native speaker would. But when English-native developers dismiss LLM-assisted writing wholesale, they're not even aware of the privilege baked into that judgment. It's like someone who's never had to do housework scoffing at a washing machine for making people “lazy”—easy to say when the burden was never yours to begin with.

1
1
0
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary: @hongminhee@hollo.social
Public
Shared by Dawn Ahukanna

I've been honestly adding Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> to every commit where I used an LLM even slightly—whether it's generating test scaffolding, drafting docs, or just bouncing ideas. I thought transparency was the right thing to do. Turns out, people see that trailer and immediately assume the whole thing is “vibe coded” AI slop, no further questions asked. The irony is that being honest about my process is what's getting my work dismissed.

Now I'm genuinely torn. Do I keep the trailer and accept that some people will write off my work at a glance? Or do I drop it and lose something I actually believe in? It's frustrating that there's no widely understood distinction between “I prompted an LLM to write my entire app” and “I used an LLM as a tool while writing my own code.” I don't have an answer yet—just sitting with the discomfort for now.

1
8
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
林小南 Siō-lâm @limsiolam@g0v.social
Public

從「她」字用作「She」的對應伊始，關於華語是否需要陰性代名詞的爭論一直都在。在歷史上大多數時間，男性／陽剛視角的觀點一直佔據語言、文字和文化、公共敘事的中心，女性／陰性視角直到近百年才慢慢地受到重視，在這個漫長的過程中，「她」字幫助女性在語言書寫中照見了自身的主體性，女性／陰性經驗在書寫中有了容身之處，也有了在公共話語場域中被看見、肯認的可能。而跨性別／非二元經驗更加邊緣，更少被言說、書寫，在公共場域中被看見、肯認是近四、五十年的事，直到最近Unicode新版本發布，「ㄨ也」字才被正式納入。

粵語字和台語字的發展，也是在尋求自身的主體性。所以，看到「佢」和「伊」被視為中性的代名詞，再照見那些藏在粵語和台語裡的辱女詞彙與性別框架，我想問的是，「佢」和「伊」是否是忽視女性／陰性以及跨性別／非二元主體性的表現？「佢」和「伊」被視為中性的代名詞，是否是無視藏在粵語和台語裡，至今未完全消散的陽剛中心？如果上述問題答案都是「是」，那麼，最後也最重要的問題，粵語、台語需要「姖」、「𡛂／𡜬」，甚或是「ㄨ巨」、「ㄨ尹」字嗎？

0
0
0
Honič Péra 24 hodin @honicpera@snac.lab8.cz
Public

S pokračováním české muniční iniciativy souhlasí 62 procent Čechů – vyplývá to ze šetření společnosti Kantar pro Českou televizi. Větší podporu má iniciativa mezi voliči opozičních stran.
ℹ️ Rozdílné postoje mají dle výsledků průzkumu voliči vládních stran – mezi podporovateli Motoristů souhlasí dvě třetiny, u hnutí ANO zhruba polovina, u voličů SPD je to 20 procent.
🔗 https://czch.tv/GFYWKC

Pokračování muniční iniciativy podporuje 62 procent Čechů, zjistil Kantar

Pokračování české muniční iniciativy, která zajišťuje dělostřeleckou munici pro Ukrajinu napadenou Ruskem, podporuje 62 procent lidí v Česku, naopak proti je 35 procent, zjistila v lednovém průzkumu pro ČT agentura Kantar CZ. Premiér Andrej Babiš (ANO) a další představitelé nové vládní koalice původně plánovali iniciativu zrušit, nakonec do ní ale Česko pouze přestane přispívat penězi.

ct24.ceskatelevize.cz

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0