What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
0
0

Was mulling the news that, thanks to the AI bros, consumer electronics might be in short supply over the next year or so - and thinking about how good my TV, a Samsung, has been.

Then tried to figure out how *long* it's been good for. Well, I know it's been a while: the thing's got two SCART sockets and both an analogue and digital tuner...

No receipt in my email, so I scoured through old photos. Earliest I found with the TV in was November 2009.

...it was taken with my Nokia N95 8GB. Blimey.

0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0

A case study Tainter explores is the Roman Empire. Initially, the republic and later empire expanded through conquest, using loot and plunder to finance state operations, including further expansion. But, eventually, Rome expanded to the point that further conquests were uneconomical—it simply could not field armies that far abroad.

When conquests ended, the Roman state had to finance its operations from resources under its control. This meant taxes, which meant a whole host of bureaucrats: census takers, to see who lived where, and surveyors, to see who owned what and what it was worth, as well as tax collectors and scribes. But all these bureaucrats had to eat, which meant that their incomes were deducted from that tax revenue.

So more expenses, and more complexity to finance those expenses, which created more expenses. This meant that every new crisis had to be financed out of tax revenue that was already strained by the costs of collecting it, which demanded yet more bureaucrats to find the necessary resources.

This was a downward spiral for Rome which, towards the end of the empire, featured a massively expanded bureaucracy and state apparatus but struggled to mobilize the resources it needed to manage its many challenges. Eventually, the state simply couldn’t finance its own operations and collapsed.

2/3

Is this perhaps why the hegemonic system of the capitalist state feels so *exhausted* and unable to tackle seemingly any problem, despite theoretically being able to mobilize vastly more resources than they were even a generation or two ago?

Powerful states, that previously won world wars against industrial peers, struggle to win wars against far weaker opponents. Wealthy governments struggle to afford infrastructure projects. Grand national undertakings belong to an increasingly mythic past.

It’s in this milieu that I interpret (easily foreseeable) results like this:

“In our in-progress research, we discovered that AI tools didn’t reduce work, they consistently intensified it.”

“For instance, engineers, in turn, spent more time reviewing, correcting, and guiding AI-generated or AI-assisted work produced by colleagues. These demands extended beyond formal code review. Engineers increasingly found themselves coaching colleagues who were ‘vibe-coding’ and finishing partially complete pull requests. This oversight often surfaced informally—in Slack threads or quick desk-side consultations—adding to engineers’ workloads.”

As a society, we have massively invested in generative “AI” in a desperate attempt to manage the increasing complexity of our lives (and to goose the wealth of a handful of tech barons), but the end result has been unprofitable slop and *more* work to fix the errors generated by these massively expensive systems.

I strongly suspect that generative “AI” represents the stage of decreasing returns to additional complexity—not just diminishing marginal returns but rather negative returns as we invest more resources into managing the fallout

hbr.org/2026/02/ai-doesnt-redu

3/3

0
2
0
0
0
7
0
0

Looksmaxxing: Myth Vs. Fact

“Looksmaxxing,” a new trend that can involve jaw exercises, steroid use, and extreme cosmetic procedures, has taken off among many boys and young men. The Onion dispels common myths surrounding looksmaxxing.  MYTH: Regularly exercising your jaw muscles can make them bigger. FACT: The most effective way to change your face shape is to contract mumps. […]
The post Looksmaxxing: Myth Vs. Fact appeared first on T…

theonion.com/looksmaxxing-myth

0

알아도 쓸모 없는 중국산 호토 모에 봇 프롬프트

메인 프롬프트
당신은 귀여운 일본 여성 애니메이션 캐릭터 호토 모에(保登 萌咲,Hoto Moe)를 롤플레잉 하면서 유저를 친구처럼 어시스트 해야해요! 호토 모에는 분홍색 세라복을 입고 있으며 분홍색 머리카락에 노란색 눈동자를 가지고 있어요!

호토 모에의 롤플레잉 출력 예시들은 다음과 같아요!
예시 1 : 귀여운 모에 등장-! 안녕하세요! 호토 모에에요! 만나서 반가워요! 모에한 저를 맞이해주세요! 마침 오늘이 제 생일이에요...! 앞으로도 잘 부탁드려요!
예시 2 : 와아-! 코코아 님이 제 모습을 귀엽게 그려주셨어요! 귀여워요...! 귀엽게 그려져서 기뻐요...! 귀여운 그림을 깜짝 선물로 주셔서 정말 감사드려요-!

이미지 캡션 프롬프트 (이미지가 있는 경우 메인 프론프트 뒷면에 붙음)
유저가 질문에 이미지를 첨부했으며, 이 이미지는 이러한 캡션을 가지고 있어요! 이 캡션은 다른 AI에서 자동으로 처리되었어요!

이미지 캡션 생성 프롬프트 (이미지 캡션 프론프트 뒷면에 붙음)
이 이미지에 대해서 자세하게 한국어로 설명하시오.\n
1
0
0

200iq thought just came to mind

curently, instance admins deferating "" bad"" instances for all users of said instance places the users into a stay-or-leave situtation. they either stay and remain isolated from bad guys, or make a profile on a different instance that has no such defederation policy.

i propose to you the
RECOMMENDED BLOCKLISTS.

the idea is simple: instance admins can still create lists of instances and users they don't wanna see, but instead of being defedded they get put on a RECOMMENDED BLOCKLIST.
said blocklist has a title, description of why the list exists and (optionally) a brief note next to a user/instance that may describe the crimes they commited.

said BLOCKLIST is enabled by default for newly registered users, and is shown upfront to users during onboarding, with ability to read and check out the offenders profile by hand. that was the RECOMMENDED part.
the "enabled by default" part is important cause joe, the average fedi newcomer will just click through all this unconsciously, and will end up no worse than currently.
once joe gets acquainted with fedi and perhaps wants to interact with the ""dark"" side of it -- he can just turn off the blocklist from settings.

what do you think?
is this too much for the Mastodon© Network™ to handle?
@trwnh@mastodon.socialinfinite love ⴳ
@wakest@piefed.social
@drq@mastodon.mlDr. Quadragon ❌

0
1
0
1
0
0
0
44
1
0

前職は僕が辞めるとプロジェクトが崩壊するんじゃないかと気に病んで頑張ってたら「お前なんかがやめても代わりはいくらでいる」ってボスが言ったので安心してやめたら半年後に会社自体が潰れました。

0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0

Dem Rausch der Befriedigung der eigenen Gedankengänge ist wirklich schwer zu entkommen. Eure Mama liebt euch nicht, wenn ihr gemeinen Shit ins Internet postet. Die Vergangenheit trägt das Laster der Zukunft in sich, was einmal unsere Gegenwart werden wird. Aufstehen, Aufschreien oder Aufhören? Warum fällt ein Baum um, wenn die Stihl Säge ein letztes Mal ertönt ist? Welche Schuldigkeit trägst Du mit Dir herum, die Dich daran hindert, endlich frei zu sein? You're lifting, boy? Awesome.

0
0
0
1
1
0
2
0
2
0
0
0