What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
2
0
0
0
0
7
2
1
1

정말로 AI가 시장의 효율을 높인다면 인력해고로 경제붕괴의 악순환에 들어가지 않으려면 4일 근무제 같은 노동시간 단축과 보편적 기본 소득으로 기업이 효율로 얻은 이득을 노동자와 나누게해야 합니다. 이걸 기업이 할까요? 아니죠. 그런 법률을 만들 정치인을 지지해야겠죠.

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:a6qvfkbrohedqy3dt6k5mdv6/post/3mflvxydp6c2b

0
1

NEW: The number of people who had personal data (and Social Security numbers) stolen in the 2025 Conduent data breach continues to rise, now affecting at least 25 million.

Conduent provides mailing and payment verification services for state government programs, and benefits for employees at big companies.

More: techcrunch.com/2026/02/24/cond

0
1
0
1
0
1
0

die Niederlagen der linken

(nicht der Partei, sondern aller linken Menschen)

Warum wird in allem, was dazu gesagt wird, nie das Kräfteverhältnis berücksichtigt? Warum muss die Auseinandersetzung mit den eigenen Niederlagen immer so emotional destruktiv sein?
Warum wird das nie als logistische und technische Frage behandelt, also wie man diese totale Übermacht austricksen kann?

0
0
0
1
0
0
2
1
1
2
2
1
0
0
1
1

How Conservatives Gave Themselves Permission to Go MAGA

Ten years ago, leading conservatives came out “Against Trump” – but soon let their disdain for “the Left” override all else.

It is the story of Modern Conservatism in a nutshell.

Some thoughts from my new piece:

🧵

steady.page/en/democracyameric

0
0
1
0
2
1
0

die Niederlagen der linken

(nicht der Partei, sondern aller linken Menschen)

Warum wird in allem, was dazu gesagt wird, nie das Kräfteverhältnis berücksichtigt? Warum muss die Auseinandersetzung mit den eigenen Niederlagen immer so emotional destruktiv sein?
Warum wird das nie als logistische und technische Frage behandelt, also wie man diese totale Übermacht austricksen kann?

0

RE: masto.sangberg.se/@troed/11609

Oh this is just too funny. Apple didn't specify why they upheld the removal of my review - but I guess that department doesn't know about the rights us Europeans have under the GDPR to request a copy of _all data a company has on us_.

I got it today. It includes the reason Apple has given internally for pulling a review.

"Offensive Content" is the motivation used.

Here's the review text in full:

"Enshittification resistant short-form video

I've been using Loops during its beta phase and I'm very happy to see it now in the general appstore. Loops is decentralized which means that there's no single person or entity that can take it over and remake algorithms to their benefit.

Loops is for you. No ads. No evil algorithms. Just shoot your videos and share - and follow the people you want without weird content popping up.

5/5 - this is awesome."

ping @pluralisticCory Doctorow if this means Apple censors on the word "enshittification" which would be funny all in itself.

0
3
0
0
0
0

Good morning! is getting started! Follow along in this thread for live posting about what's happening on stage.

I believe you may still be able to purchase a live streaming ticket, too so check that out.

If you'd rather not see this thread, you can mute me for a few hours. :)

fedimtl.ca/#register

0
0
0
0
1

The @w3cWorld Wide Web Consortium Maintenance issues EPUB Annotations 1.0 as , enabling richer reading and improved interoperability
▶️ w3.org/TR/epub-anno-10/

This document defines a profile of the Web Annotation Data Model for publications, enabling annotations such as highlights, notes, and bookmarks to be expressed using embedded -LD. The spec. also introduces Annotation Sets for packaging and sharing annotations.

Feedback welcome: github.com/w3c/epub-specs/issu

 Example 1: Core structure of an EPUB annotation

{
    "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/epub-anno.jsonld",
    "id": "urn:uuid:123-123-123-123",
    "type": "Annotation",
    "created": "2023-10-14T15:13:28Z",
    "modified": "2024-01-29T09:00:00Z",
    "target": {
        …
    },
    "body": {
        …
    }
}
0

이탈리아공대 연구진이 신생아들에게 음악을 들려주며 실험한 결과, 아기들은 태어날 때 이미 리듬을 인식하고 예측하는 능력을 갖고 있는 것으로 나타났다고 공개학술지 ‘플로스(PLOS) 생물학’에 발표했습니다. 아기들은 그러나 멜로디에는 별다른 반응을 보이지 않았습니다.

칭얼거리는 아기, 규칙적으로 토닥여야 하는 이유 밝혀졌...

0
1
0
0
1