This is the script of my national radio report yesterday on the worsening mess around age verification for social media. As always, there may have been minor wording variations from this script as I presented this report live on air.
- - -
Well, the technical term for the situation regarding social media age restrictions is "utter train wreck." Indeed as more countries and U.S. states work to enact attempts at social media age restrictions (that now apparently includes California by the way) pretty much all of the problems that critics of this entire concept predicted have been coming true, but politicians on a bipartisan basis just keep plowing on pushing this stuff, as if they're living on some another planet and can't see what's happening here on Earth.
Some of the laws are in litigation, some are already in force, but everywhere you look it's an escalating mess. It's important to note that by and large, I think it's fair to say that most persons pushing for these age restrictions have laudable motives and are frustrated by bad social media content that their kids may interact with. This is completely understandable. But pushing concepts that do not actually solve this problem -- and in fact can make the situation even worse, is not good policy to say the least. It can result in terrible privacy problems for everyone -- including adults and children -- and potentially drives children to disreputable sites on the Net that are of far more concern than the mainstream social media sites.
Australia has been considered to be the big test case with their under 16 years old ban, and most independent observers are saying it's not going well there. Many parents are helping their children evade the ban (it may be as high as 1 in 3 parents or more) because they feel the ban is too restrictive and cutting their children off from useful and educational content -- because indeed not EVERYTHING on social media is bad. In some ways a universal ban for social media use is like banning children from entering libraries because there are SOME books in there that could be inappropriate for them.
And of course by saying "you can't do this" the bans turn social media into a "forbidden fruit" that makes them even more attractive to kids, many of whom are far more Internet skilled than the adults around them. So, kids are using VPNs to bypass the ban, they're using AI and other methods to fool various systems that are supposed to verify ages based on video selfies. They're using the accounts of their parents (as I mentioned, often with their parents approval), or the accounts of older siblings or friends.
We've discussed before the major risks associated with the provision of government credentials for ID purposes that may be required for some of these age verification systems at various times. Remember, adult users have to be verified as well to prove that they aren't children! And we know there have already been major breaches of security of some of these systems, despite assurances that their specific designs only held the IDs for a brief time.
In fact, the social media site Discord is currently embroiled in a major controversy involving their age verification plans, age verification tests, which third parties were involved in all this, how secure the ID data was and is, and more complicating factors -- the bottom line is that many of their users are absolutely livid over Discord's apparent behavior in this regard, especially since there had reportedly previously been a breach that exposed many Discord users' government ID information!
Most observers feel that all of this is a harbinger of worse situations to come. And then of course there are all the concerns about how various governments could use age verification ID data for tracking exactly how individuals use the broader Internet, by expanding age verification requirements beyond social media, creating a vast Internet surveillance regime such as is present in China.
We all want to protect the children, but so far, age verification does not appear to be the right tool for that job, and instead may be dragging us in a direction that may actually do more harm.
- - -
L