What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
1
50
1
0

ใƒ‹ใƒชใƒ ใ„ใ„ไบ‹ๆ•™ใˆใฆใ‚ใ’ใ‚ˆใฃใ‹๏ผŸ

ใฟใ™ใใƒผใชใ‚‰้‹ๅ–ถใŒ่ฆ‹ใฆใชใ„ใ‹ใ‚‰DM้€ใ‚Šๆ”พ้กŒใ ใžใ€ใ•ใใ“ใ„

1
0
0
1
0

ํ—ค๋ธ๋ฒˆ์ฆˆ๋ ˆ๋“œ ๊น”์•„๋†“๊ณ  ๋ฌด๋ฃŒ์—ฐ์ฑ ๋งŒ ๋ฐ›์•„๋จน๋Š” ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์ด ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์— ์žˆ๋‹ค

ํ—ค๋ธ๋ฒˆ์ฆˆ๋ ˆ๋“œ๊ฐ€ ๋ญํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒŒ์ž„์ด๋ƒ๋ฉด์š”
ํ—ค๋ธ๋ฒˆ์ฆˆ๋ ˆ๋“œ๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ๊พธ๋กœ ํ•ด๋ณด์„ธ์š”
๋“œ๋ ˆ์ฆˆ๋ฒˆ๋ธํ—ค...
๊ทธ๋ ‡์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค
The ๋ ˆ์ฆˆ ๋นˆ๋ฒˆํ•ด ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค

1
0

I make a free programming tool. It gives your LLM a living memory, and it can to dig into a codebase and build a deep understanding of how and why anything was done before doing beginning something new. It also nudges you into better habits while coding with an LLM overall. Learn more/try it out.

Deciduous - Your AI Assistant ...

0
0
0

I've been increasingly concerned about the corporate monopoly over frontier LLMs. While many ethically-minded people choose to boycott these models, I believe passive resistance alone cannot break the structural grip of big tech. To truly โ€œliberateโ€ these technologies and turn them into public goods, we need to look beyond moral high grounds and engage with the material basis of AIโ€”specifically compute, data, and the relations of production.

I've written two posts exploring this through the lens of historical materialism. The first piece analyzes why current โ€œopen sourceโ€ definitions struggle with LLMs, and the second discusses what it means to โ€œact materialisticallyโ€ in our imperfect world. My goal is to suggest a path forward that moves from mere boycotting to a more proactive, structural socialization of AI infrastructure.

If you've been feeling uneasy about the AI landscape but aren't sure if boycotting is the final answer, I'd love for you to give these a read:

5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

์˜›๋‚ ์— ์•Œ๋ฐ”ํ• ๋•Œ ์‚ฌ์žฅ์ด๋ž‘ ์ง์›์ด ๋งจ๋‚  ์น˜ํ‚จ ๋–ก๋ณถ์ด ์‚ฌ์ฃผ๊ณ  ๋‚˜๋ณด๊ณ  ๋‹ค ๋จน์œผ๋ผ ํ•ด์„œ ์™œ์ผ€ ์ž˜ํ•ด์ฃผ๋‚˜ ํ–ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ ์ƒ๊ฐํ•ด๋ณด๋‹ˆ ์ž๊ทน์ ์ธ๊ฑฐ ๋จน๊ณ ๋Š” ์‹ถ์€๋ฐ ์ค‘๋…„ ์—ฌ์„ฑ ์†Œํ™” ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ๋‹ค ๋ชป๋จน์œผ๋‹ˆ๊นŒ ํ•œ๋‘์ž…๋งŒ ๋จน๊ณ ์‹ถ์–ด์„œ ์‹œํ‚จ๊ฑฐ๊ฐ™์Œ

0

ๆˆ‘ๆœ€ๅ–œๆญก็š„Y2K็‰น่‰ฒ/่จ˜ๆ†ถๆ˜ฏ่ทณ่ˆžๆฉŸ็š„้…ๆ›ฒ
่จ˜ๅพ—ๅฐๆ™‚ๅ€™ๆ•ดๆข่ก—้ƒฝๆœƒๆ’ญ้‚ฃๅนพ้ฆ–
้•ทๅคงๆ‰็Ÿฅ้“ๆญŒ่ฉžๅ…งๅฎนๅ……ๆปฟๆ€งๆš—็คบๅ’Œๆทซ่คปwwww

ไธ้Ž้‚ฃ็จฎๅพ‹ๅ‹•ๆ„Ÿ็œŸ็š„ๅพˆ่ฎš

youtu.be/IlDjEd8gAkI?si=q27PAo

0
0

I've been increasingly concerned about the corporate monopoly over frontier LLMs. While many ethically-minded people choose to boycott these models, I believe passive resistance alone cannot break the structural grip of big tech. To truly โ€œliberateโ€ these technologies and turn them into public goods, we need to look beyond moral high grounds and engage with the material basis of AIโ€”specifically compute, data, and the relations of production.

I've written two posts exploring this through the lens of historical materialism. The first piece analyzes why current โ€œopen sourceโ€ definitions struggle with LLMs, and the second discusses what it means to โ€œact materialisticallyโ€ in our imperfect world. My goal is to suggest a path forward that moves from mere boycotting to a more proactive, structural socialization of AI infrastructure.

If you've been feeling uneasy about the AI landscape but aren't sure if boycotting is the final answer, I'd love for you to give these a read:

5
3
0
0

I've been increasingly concerned about the corporate monopoly over frontier LLMs. While many ethically-minded people choose to boycott these models, I believe passive resistance alone cannot break the structural grip of big tech. To truly โ€œliberateโ€ these technologies and turn them into public goods, we need to look beyond moral high grounds and engage with the material basis of AIโ€”specifically compute, data, and the relations of production.

I've written two posts exploring this through the lens of historical materialism. The first piece analyzes why current โ€œopen sourceโ€ definitions struggle with LLMs, and the second discusses what it means to โ€œact materialisticallyโ€ in our imperfect world. My goal is to suggest a path forward that moves from mere boycotting to a more proactive, structural socialization of AI infrastructure.

If you've been feeling uneasy about the AI landscape but aren't sure if boycotting is the final answer, I'd love for you to give these a read:

5
3
0
0

์˜ค๋žœ๋งŒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทผํ™ฉ ๊ฒธ...

2์›” ๋ง ํ‡ด์‚ฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ญ์‹œ Web3๋Š” ์ œ๊ฐ€ "์ž˜" ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฑฐ์ง€ "์ข‹์•„" ํ•˜์ง„ ์•Š๋Š” ๊ฒƒ ๊ฐ™์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ฐ€๋„ ์ข‹๊ณ  ๊ณ„์† ํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ ๋ญ”๊ฐ€ ์ด์   ์‹œ๋“คํ•ด์ง€๊ธฐ๋„ ํ–ˆ๊ณ , ์›๋ž˜๋ถ€ํ„ฐ Web3๋กœ ์ปค๋ฆฌ์–ด๋ฅผ ์žก์œผ๋ ค๊ณ  ํ–ˆ๋˜ ๊ฒƒ๋„ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ์„œ ๋‹ค์Œ ์ง์žฅ์„ ์•Œ์•„๋ดค์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ 4์›” 1์ผ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ํฌ๋ ˆํŽ˜(์ฟ ํ‚คํ”Œ๋ ˆ์ด์Šค)๋กœ ์˜ฎ๊น๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊น€๋ฏผ์ƒ(bis_cir_kit) ๋‹˜ ์ถ”์ฒœ์œผ๋กœ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜์—ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ํƒ€์ž…์œผ๋กœ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๊ฑด ์›๋ž˜ ์ข‹์•„ํ•˜๋˜ ์ผ์ด๋ผ์„œ ์Šคํƒ๋„ ์ž˜ ๋งž๊ณ , ํšŒ์‚ฌ ๊ฐ์„ฑ๋„ ์™„์ „ ์ฐฐ๋–ก์ด๋ผ ์ผ์ฃผ์ผ ๋งŒ์— ํ•ฉ๋ฅ˜ ๊ฒฐ์ •์ด ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ทธ ์‚ฌ์ด์—” ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ ์ผ์ •๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฐ”๋นด์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 3์›” 7์ผ์— ๋Œ€๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ฒฐํ˜ผํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๋ฉ€์–ด์„œ ๋ฏธ์•ˆํ•œ ๋‚˜๋จธ์ง€ ์ฒญ์ฒฉ์žฅ์€ ๋งŽ์ด ๋ชป ๋Œ๋ ธ์ง€๋งŒ ์ด๋ ‡๊ฒŒ๋‚˜๋งˆ ์†Œ์‹์€ ์ „ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

wedding.suho.io ์—์„œ ์ €ํฌ ์‚ฌ์ง„๊ณผ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋” ํ™•์ธํ•˜์‹ค ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋˜ํ•œ 2์›” ์ค‘์ˆœ์ฏค ํ‡ด์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ํ™•์ •๋˜๊ณ  ๋‚˜์„œ ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ํ”„๋กœ์ ํŠธ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. whaleback.suho.io ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ•œ๊ตญ ์ฃผ์‹์„ ๊ฐ ์ข…๋ชฉ๋ณ„๋กœ ํ€€ํŠธ ๋ถ„์„ํ•ด ์ฃผ๊ณ , AI ๋ฆฌํฌํŠธ๋กœ ์ผ๊ฐ„ ํŠธ๋ Œ๋“œ๋ฅผ ์•Œ๋ ค์ฃผ๋Š” ๋“ฑ, ๊ฐ์ข… ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ธฐ ํŽธํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ •๋ฆฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์‚ฌ์šฉํ•ด ๋ณด์‹œ๊ณ  ๊ถ๊ธˆํ•œ ์  ์žˆ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜, ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ฉด ์ € ๊ฐœ์ธ์ด ๊ถ๊ธˆํ•˜์‹œ๋”๋ผ๋„ ์—ฐ๋ฝ์ฃผ์„ธ์š”. ๊ฐ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

9
1
0
0

์นดํŽ˜์—์„œ ๋„˜ ๋ง›์žˆ๋Š” ๋ƒ„์ƒˆ ๋จผ๊ฐ€ ๋ฒ„ํ„ฐ ๋ƒ„์ƒˆ๋ž‘ ์น˜ํ‚จ ๋ƒ„์ƒˆ๊ฐ™๊ธฐ๋„ ํ•˜๊ณ  KFC ์Šค์ฝ˜ ๋ƒ„์ƒˆ๊ฐ™์€๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋ฌด์Šจ ๋ฉ”๋‰ด์˜€์„๊นŒ ๊ถ๊ธˆ

0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1

์ƒ์–ด๋ฉ”์ด๋“œ. ์ด๊ฒƒ๋„ ๊ฟˆ์—์„œ ๋ดค์—ˆ๋‚˜, ๊ทธ๋ƒฅ ์ƒ์–ด ๊ทธ๋ฆด ๋•Œ ๊ทธ๋ ธ๋‚˜ ๊ธฐ์–ต์ด ์•ˆ ๋‚œ๋‹ค. ์™œ ๊ทธ๋ ธ์„๊นŒ์š”. ์–ด์จŒ๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ๋ฉ”์ด๋“œ๋„ ์ข‹๊ณ  ์ƒ์–ด๋„ ์ข‹์œผ๋‹ˆ๊นŒ ์ƒ์–ด๋ฉ”์ด๋“œ๋Š” ์ •๋ง ์ข‹์€ ๊ฑฐ๊ฒ ์ฃ . ํ•˜ํ•˜

0
์ฒญ์†Œ๋…„ ๋…๋ฆฝ์–ธ๋ก  ํ† ๋ผํ’€์—์„œ ๊ต๋ณต ๊ด€๋ จ ์„ค๋ฌธ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ด๋ฒˆ์— ์ •๋ถ€์—์„œ ๋‚ด๋ฆฐ ์ง€์นจ์œผ๋กœ ํ•™์ƒ์˜ ๊ต๋ณต ์ง€์นจ์ด ๋ฐ”๋€Œ๋Š” ๋ชจ์–‘์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(์ƒํ™œ๋ณต/์ฒด์œก๋ณต ์œ„์ฃผ๋กœ).

๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ๋ฐ ์ด ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ์ •์ฑ…์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์ธ ํ•™์ƒ์˜ ๋ชฉ์†Œ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์†Œ์™ธ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฐ์ด ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ค์ œ๋กœ ์ •์ฑ… ๊ณผ์ • ์ค‘์— ๋ฏธ์„ฑ๋…„์ž์˜ ๋ชฉ์†Œ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ˜์˜๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ๋“œ๋ฌผ์ง€์š”.

๊ทธ๋Ÿฐ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ, ํ† ๋ผํ’€์—์„œ ์„ค๋ฌธ์กฐ์‚ฌ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์—ฐํ•ฉ์šฐ์ฃผ์˜ ๊ต๋ณต ์ฐฉ์šฉ์ž(์ฃผ๋กœ ์ค‘๊ณ ๋“ฑํ•™์ƒ) ๋ถ„๋“ค๊ป˜์„œ๋Š” ์„ค๋ฌธ์— ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•ด ์ •์ฑ…์— ์ž์‹ ์˜ ์˜๊ฒฌ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•  ๊ธฐํšŒ๋ฅผ ์žก์œผ์‹œ๊ธธ ๋ฐ”๋ž๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeukcJImB7mDq8E9G_nADKoTx1k5NzSXZ1abZAfA0WdppVLTg/viewform?pli=1
0

I've been increasingly concerned about the corporate monopoly over frontier LLMs. While many ethically-minded people choose to boycott these models, I believe passive resistance alone cannot break the structural grip of big tech. To truly โ€œliberateโ€ these technologies and turn them into public goods, we need to look beyond moral high grounds and engage with the material basis of AIโ€”specifically compute, data, and the relations of production.

I've written two posts exploring this through the lens of historical materialism. The first piece analyzes why current โ€œopen sourceโ€ definitions struggle with LLMs, and the second discusses what it means to โ€œact materialisticallyโ€ in our imperfect world. My goal is to suggest a path forward that moves from mere boycotting to a more proactive, structural socialization of AI infrastructure.

If you've been feeling uneasy about the AI landscape but aren't sure if boycotting is the final answer, I'd love for you to give these a read:

5
3
0
1

โš ๏ธ Update: 's internet blackout has now surpassed 48 hours, leaving its population of 90 million out of touch as war spreads.

Shutdowns are a go-to tactic for the regime, with the previous instance in January lasting several weeks and masking severe human rights violations.

Graph from NetBlocks showing network connectivity in Iran from February 24, 2026, to March 2, 2026. The y-axis represents normalized connectivity, ranging from 0% to 100%, and the x-axis represents the dates. The green line representing Iran's connectivity normal most of the time period, with a sharp drop on the morning of February 28. The drop in connectivity aligns with nation-scale internet blackout imposed during joint military strikes by the US and Israel. The minimum and current connectivity levels are indicated as 1% and 1%, respectively. The chart has a dark background with a red horizontal arrow labeled 'SHUTDOWN', indicates the period of disruption and includes the NetBlocks logo in the lower left corner.
0
1
0
1
0