What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

2
0
0
1

구글이 올해 9월부터 인증된 기기에 설치되는 앱은 플레이스토어 내외에 관계없이 개발자 인증을 강제한다고 한 것에 대해 뉴파이프는 그럼 못 쓰는거지 뭐 라고 대응하기로 했나 보네요.

아 이거 이제 없으면 안될 지경이 됐는데 어떡하지. 메인 기기를 FOSS 로 쓰기는 너무 빡센데 ㅠ ㅠ

1

80돌 한국노총, "과오 사과"…AI시대 노동권 보호체계 구축 추진 송고2026-03-10 11:25 창립 80주년 기념식…노란봉투법 시행 계기 200만 조직화 목표 김동명 "한국노총, 과거 유신체제 지지해 '어용노조' 이미지…과오에 사과" www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR2026...

80돌 한국노총, "과오 사과"…AI시대 노동권 보호체...

0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
3
0
0
1
0
0
0

I have complicated and tangled views about the programming efficiency debate. To simplify and condense, I don't think programmers are using their time less effectively than they were in the 1970s and 1980s. Given constant programming time, more powerful but less efficient tools give you more functionality (at a cost) than frugal but less powerful, more constrained approaches.

(all of this is sparked from nexus.torment.ca/@scrivolical/ )

0
1
0
0
1
0
1

트럼프 행정부가 감행한 이란에 대한 대규모 군사 작전과 확전 양상에 대해 워싱턴의 한반도·안보 전문가들은 “미국의 대외전략과 모순되는 결정”이라며 우려를 쏟아냈습니다. 이번 전쟁이 이란의 핵무장 유인을 키우는 것은 물론, 미국의 군사·외교 역량을 중동에 묶으면서 동북아 안보와 세계 경제에도 연쇄 충격을 줄 수 있다고 경고했습니다.

미 전문가들이 본 이란 전쟁…“핵 확산, 한반도 안보,...

0
1
0
0
0

So I think in the NDP leadership vote I'm putting Tanille and Lewis first, and I think I'm putting Rob (who sent a bunch of *weird* emails, and was caught using ChatGPT for campaign communications) last. Does anyone want to try to convince me to put "Tony McQuail" above Heather McPherson, or vice versa?

0
0

最近うちに来てくれたLiDAR付きルンバさんは家具を無視して地図を作ってくれるふいんきです。掃除の時はまず右手(ネコじゃらしブラシのある側)法で現在の部屋の輪郭を把握してからその内側のぬりつぶす感じで障害物を避けながら掃除してくれるよ。

0
0
0
1

So there's a tiny tiny percentage of people in my mentions right now that are accusing me of horrible things because they don't like Bluesky and I've taken money from them.

For these people, I'm not saying you have to like Bluesky's moderation practices or the decision they make for their own app, I would never say such.

These people fundamentally do not get standards, and especially web standards, and how they are made. So here's a small explanation for people.

In the standards community, there's practically a code that is we do not argue about our employers or financial supporters' corporate positions, we leave our companies at the door when we participate in writing open standards.

Sure, some of us my represent our given employers within the standards community (and there's a requirement to disclose affiliations), but there's also a bunch of us that operate entirely independently of any given company.

At the W3C, which is the home of the FedCM standard, they have what are known as Invited Experts, and the W3C enforces that they act independently and that they disclose any affiliation, especially financial.

I am an Invited Expert, that happened before Bluesky decided to fund my work. Bluesky, like them or not, are one of the few organizations that actually has the capital to fund standards work. Doing this work isn't cheap either! It's a tonne of work seeking consensus and reaching agreement to move things forwards.

Like, I'm current budgeting 30-50% of my productive time over the next year will be working on this standard.

When I first chatted with Bluesky, they were initially like "we want to do a three month freelance contract to implement FedCM for AT Protocol", and after some conversation, we settled on "no, this shouldn't be a contract but instead a grant, that allows you to be completely independent of bluesky and explicitly enables you to work across decentralized protocols, making FedCM better for everyone"

The grant is explicitly clear contractually that I am entirely independent from bluesky, like I could make a technical decision others at bluesky do not like (unlikely, but possible), and it would not affect the grant.

It explicitly requires me to work across protocols.

0
5
0
3
0

Donald Trump lies constantly, and yet almost never gets confronted to his face about his obvious deceptions.

The New York Times's Shawn McCreesh did something today that should happen in every Trump news conference, he actually asked Trump about one of his most blatant lies. It did not go well for Trump:

0
0
1
0
1
0
3