Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdeG4fsEviE
오사카에 전체 길이 30m, 지름 5m짜리 철제 파이프가 부력으로 튀어오르는 일이 일어났는데, 지금 파이프에 물을 넣어 가라앉히는 중.
확실히 전보다는 많이 내려가긴 했다
Shipping a signed & notarized macOS app from #Rust shouldn't require 200 lines of bash.
cargo codesign macos --app "My https://App.app" — done.
Wrote up why I built it and how it works:
https://d34dl0ck.me/cargo-codesign/index.html
서서담
@hillside@kurry.social힐씨 내가 삥크 내가 삥크
오~ 마리오.. 좀 하는데? ... 죽어!!!
꺄하하하핳 마~리오 ㅋㅋ 
난 간다
아니 왜! 이럴 때만! 붕붕이가! 조별과제가...
🔑🚪
(경악)
맵이 이상해.. 맵이
💙 싫어요!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdeG4fsEviE
오사카에 전체 길이 30m, 지름 5m짜리 철제 파이프가 부력으로 튀어오르는 일이 일어났는데, 지금 파이프에 물을 넣어 가라앉히는 중.
확실히 전보다는 많이 내려가긴 했다
맥북네오는 오히려 모바일 칩셋을 사용해서 배터리 시간 늘어나는 장점이 더 커보인다
6·3 지방선거 출마를 준비하는 유행열 전 청와대 선임행정관이 자신에게 40년 전 성폭력을 당했다고 주장한 A씨에 대해 ‘거짓 미투’ ‘정치 공작’ 등이라 비난한 것은 ‘2차 가해에 해당한다’고 더불어민주당 젠더폭력신고상담센터가 판단했다. 그러나 충북도당 고문단이 비슷한 취지로 한 기자회견은 유 전...
6·3 지방선거 출마를 준비하는 유행열 전 청와대 선임...
So a pilot said they could see a light on the runway... ATC said they couldn't see anything from the tower or on ground radar... You know what that means... Newark is haunted
We are building data breach machines and nobody cares
Link: https://idealloc.me/posts/we-are-building-data-breach-machines-and-nobody-cares/
Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47324058
#MicrosoftAgentFramework 워크샵에서 한나절만에 이걸 다 한다구요? 네, 정말로 다 합니다!
참가신청 👉 https://bit.ly/agentcamp-daegu-2026
맞다AI가 와 함께 하는 #AgentCamp 지금 바로 신청하세요!
#matdaaiga #agentcamp #globalai #ai #microsoft #agentframework #foundry #mcp #aspire
#Agent Camp
지하에서 배관이 솟아났으면 현실마리오 아니에요?
신동ㄱ... 아아니 오사카니까 신대판시인가?
一 転 攻 勢
Die 20-Uhr-Ausgabe der #Tagesschau verzichtet bei ihrer Berichterstattung zur #Weimer-Affäre darauf zu erwähnen, dass die 115 Buchhandlungen, die mit dem Deutschen #Buchhandlungspreis nominiert sind, sich geschlossen hinter die drei ausgeschlossenen linken Buchläden stellen.
おでかけ瑞穂さんrkgk
高野豆腐の使い方は、 #ダジャレです
I'm writing this in English.
Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.
This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.
@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.
For many of us, translation is first about access.
The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.
@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.
There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.
I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.
The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.
ゼッツ最新話まで追いついた おもろいじゃん
Morro Bay, California, US
‘A beachgoer enjoys a stroll at sundown, dwarfed by the volcanic plug that is Morro Rock.’
Photograph: Thomas Ryan
突然覺得這書名《就算是文科生，到異世界也不必感到抱歉》超怪。
不管是文科生、理科生，穿越到了劍與魔法的世界，立足點是一樣的吧！並不會有理科生比較優勢的地方......
明るいうちのビールはおいしいんだよねえ！
100만원 대면 30~40만원대 저가노트북이 아니라 LG나 삼성 비슷한 노트북과 비교하면 마감 별차이없을 것 같은데?
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/092/0002413807
6·3 지방선거 출마를 준비하는 유행열 전 청와대 선임행정관이 자신에게 40년 전 성폭력을 당했다고 주장한 A씨에 대해 ‘거짓 미투’ ‘정치 공작’ 등이라 비난한 것은 ‘2차 가해에 해당한다’고 더불어민주당 젠더폭력신고상담센터가 판단했다. 그러나 충북도당 고문단이 비슷한 취지로 한 기자회견은 유 전...
6·3 지방선거 출마를 준비하는 유행열 전 청와대 선임...
dobranoc :3
これもうモノリスだろ
유희왕 애니메이션 공식이 백악관이 멋대로 AI영상 만든 것에 정색하는 입장을 일/영으로 게시.
変な写真
군사 목표달성하면 도망가는..?
"이란 전쟁 종료 시점에 대해 "궁극적으로 작전은 최고사령관(트럼프 대통령)이 군사적 목표가 완전히 달성되었다고 판단할 때, 그리고 이란이 자신들의 선언 여부와 무관하게 완전하고 무조건적 항복 상태에 이르렀다고 판단할 때"라며 미국의 판단에 따라 이란 군사작전을 끝낼 수 있음을 시사"
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/001/0015951902
コンテナ船なら詰まったことあったねw
Are you doing ok? I need to know y'all are doing ok.
Mastodon has a new human-over-AI contribution policy.
tl;dr:
- The human contributor is the sole party responsible for the contribution.
- If AI was used to generate a significant portion of your contribution (i.e. beyond simple autocomplete), we require you to disclose it in the Pull Request description.
- If you cannot guarantee the provenance and legal safety of the AI-generated code, do not submit it.
- Cases of repeated violations of these ... guidelines could result in a ban from our repositories.
PLOの歴史を肴にビール枯渇🥺
I'm writing this in English.
Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.
This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.
@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.
For many of us, translation is first about access.
The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.
@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.
There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.
I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.
The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.
I'm writing this in English.
Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.
This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.
@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.
For many of us, translation is first about access.
The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.
@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.
There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.
I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.
The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.
buckle up <-> buckle down axis
Kew Gardens, London, UK
‘One of the many beauties on display at the annual orchid festival at Kew.’
Photograph: Helena Gardiner
이란의 3대 최고지도자로 모지타바 하메네이가 선출된 가운데 미국·이스라엘과 이란 간 전쟁이 11일째를 맞은 10일, 중동 전문가들은 도널드 트럼프 미국 대통령의 압박이 오히려 이란의 ‘벼랑 끝 전술’을 자극해 전쟁이 장기 소모전으로 이어질 가능성이 크다고 분석했습니다.
트럼프 ‘종전’ 말하지만…전문가들 “이란 전쟁, 장기 ...
업어 키웠던 딸네미가 석상으로 세워질 만한 전설이 된 시대에
美國和以色列聯手攻擊伊朗，擊殺最高領袖哈梅內伊。烏克蘭駐南非大使 Olexander Scherba 上星期在 x 發文，指伊朗駐比勒陀利亞大使館通知他們，已為哈梅內伊和被擊殺的軍方領袖設弔唁冊，他認為這情況奇怪，決定公開回應。
Scherba 回應伊朗邀請，指要「提醒」伊朗外交官幾點。他指出，伊朗作為羅俄斯的盟友，已故的伊朗領導人們，雙手沾滿烏克蘭人的鮮血，無數烏克蘭人被伊朗製的沙赫德無人機和其他武器殺死，「伊朗的領袖是為烏克蘭人帶來無盡傷痛的幫兇。」
「作為一個有信仰的人，我盡量不為他人的死而歡慶…但過去三年每晚都聽到伊朗製造的殺戮機器，在基輔和其他烏克蘭城市上空咆哮，我忍不住希望所有罪犯都受到應有的懲罰。」
Scherba 最後指，他個人並不認識伊朗的外交官，作為個人亦和他無仇無怨，明白有時好的外交官要為壞領袖的決策賣單，「但我也希望你明白，哈梅內伊之死我不會感到傷感，也不會為此致哀。」
https://www.instagram.com/p/DVugOc7j0uI/
이짤 좋아함
Salina Nature Reserve, Malta
‘A Mediterranean chameleon beautifully camouflaged in vegetation. One of 50 in a small patch of garden on a nature reserve.’
Photograph: David Heath
We definitely follow the Japanese method, here.
封鎖したんかー #ダジャレです
phildini
一般 Kyungmi Ahn ꉂꉂ(ᴖᗜᴖ*) 
pkg update
🛡️ 
Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) 
Quincy ⁂
쯔방 
earthling
MJ+
Maho 🦝🍻
O Compadre de Ogum
Nicovel0 🍉
Evan Prodromou
Dizzy