What is Hackers' Pub?

Hackers' Pub is a place for software engineers to share their knowledge and experience with each other. It's also an ActivityPub-enabled social network, so you can follow your favorite hackers in the fediverse and get their latest posts in your feed.

0
0
0
0
0
0

소학관, 주간문춘 보도에 대한 설명. 거래처 직원한테 갑질로 성적인 행위를 요구하였고 형사 고발을 당했다고. *다른 사건입니다!!! 그러나 2025년까지 근무하다가 또 다른 부적절한 행위가 밝혀져 퇴사. "또한 해당 전직 직원을 비롯해 당사 직원 및 관계자에 대한 비방이나 사생활 침해 행위는 삼가해 주실 것을 간곡히 부탁드립니다." 파도파도 괴담 정도가 아니잖아? www.shogakukan.co.jp/news/477346

「週刊文春」の弊社に関する報道について | 小学館

「週刊文春」の弊社に関する報道について | 小学館

「週刊文春」2026年3月19日号(3月12日発売)の弊社に関する記事についてご説明いたします。    弊社元従業員による不適切な行為に対し、被害に遭われた方にあらためてお詫び申し上げます。弊社の社員教育および管理監督体制の不備を深く反省しております。 2018年に弊社従業員の不適切な行為がありました。具体的な内容は守秘義務がありますので申し上げられませんが、取引先の従業員に対して、取引関係上の優位性を利用した状況の下で性的な行為を求め、その後も不謹慎な連絡をしておりました。 2020年に当該従業員が被害者から刑事告訴を受け、弊社も事案を把握し、被害者やその関係者に謝罪し、不起訴処分になっております。その時点で社内では、専門家の意見も聞いた上で、当該従業員に対し処分をしております。ところがその後、2025年に同一従業員による他の不適切な行為が明らかになったため、然るべき調査をしたところ、本人が責任を認め、退職いたしました。 しかしながら、「週刊文春」記事には、事実誤認がございます。「小学館は写真集出版をいわば“バーター”として決め、それに伴う金銭を会社から委託元会社に支出する異様な形で、トラブルを握り潰した」との記述がありますが、写真集出版は、被害者の業務委託元の会社より提案されたものです。弊社が記事にあるようにトラブルを握り潰した事実はございません。「週刊文春」の報道に対し強く抗議いたします。 弊社では、ハラスメント防止セミナーや社内会議などで法令遵守を徹底するための社員教育を行っております。弊社社員に法令等の違反があった場合には、調査を行い会社として適切な処置をしております。    ただいま弊社は、マンガワンにおいて、児童買春・ポルノ禁止法違反(製造)で有罪判決を受けた作家を、被害者のお気持ちに反し、別のペンネームで起用したことについて厳しいご批判を受けております。この度の件も第三者委員会に報告する考えです。 一連の事案において、女性の尊厳と人権を尊重する意識が欠如していたことを重く受け止め、組織としての責任を痛感しております。 あらためて、読者の皆様、お取引先様、弊社事業にご協力いただいている皆様、関係各所の皆様に多大なるご心配とご迷惑をおかけしたことを深くお詫びいたします。      現在、さまざまなご批判やご意見を頂戴しており、真摯に受け止めております。 なお、当該の元従業員をはじめ、弊社従業員及び関係者への誹謗中傷やプライバシーを侵害する行為は厳に慎まれますよう、切にお願い申し上げます。   小学館

www.shogakukan.co.jp · 小学館

0
0
0
5
0
0
3

I'm writing this in English.

Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.

This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.

@GargronEugen Rochko argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.

For many of us, translation is first about access.

The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.

@GargronEugen Rochko notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.

There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.

I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @GargronEugen Rochko describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.

The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.

5
13
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0

Bester Tag, um sich für linke Buchhandlungen und linke Verlage zu positionieren: 14. März ! Kauft ihnen die Regale leer, füllt eure Reading List-Stapel und verschenkt guten Lesestoff an eure Liebsten. Gesellschaftliche Veränderung beginnt damit, dass wir die Zukunft neu denken – als eine kollektive, gerechte und verantwortungsvolle. Linke Bücher öffnen die Räume dafür!

Katze geht von einer Feuerball-Explosion im Hintergrund weg. Daneben stehen die Begriffe »Weimer« und »Buchhandlungspreis«. Ihr wisst wo.
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0

【私のパソコン履歴書】草野貴之さん(元ASAHIネット社長) PC-6001からASAHIネット社長へ。技術への好奇心が人生を切り拓く
https://retropcnews.com/archives/2428

普通のインタビュー記事のはずがなんか
治安の悪い見覚えのある写真が混ざってますね…

0
0
0
3
0
0

Furthermore, I think Bluesky is providing something valuable: a lot of people are trying to leave X-Twitter *right now* because it has become a completely toxic place.

The fact that Bluesky's team has managed to scale to receive such users is incredible, nearly feeling miraculous.

On the fediverse we also see a lot of accusations of Bluesky being owned by Jack Dorsey, and this isn't true. My understanding is that Jay performed an impressive amount of negotiation to allow Bluesky to receive funding independently.

These days Jack Dorsey is instead focusing on Nostr, which I can only describe as "a sequel to Secure Scuttlebutt with extremely bad vibes where bitcoin people talk about bitcoin"

0
9
0

I participated a bit in the process of when Bluesky was Jack Dorsey and Parag Agrawal's personal project. I also believe Jack and Parag were sincere about Bluesky as a decentralized social network protocol that Twitter would adopt, which is the directive that Bluesky was given as an organization.

When Jay Graber was awarded the position to lead Bluesky, I was not surprised. To me, Jay was the obvious choice to deliver what Bluesky was being directed, and I do think Jay is an excellent leader

There is also something which Bluesky gets right which the fediverse does not. I mentioned that Bluesky uses decentralization *techniques*, and the most important of those is content-addressing. This allows content to exist even when a server goes down.

This is a great decision and I have advocated that the fediverse do so as well. In fact several years ago I wrote a demo in @spritelyThe Spritely Institute's early days showing off how one could build a content-addressed ActivityPub in a spec-compatible way.

0
3
0
0
0
0

Remember that the idea of "fully self-hosting" on Bluesky/ATProto at this point is primarily abstract; nobody is really doing it. But of course there's a place where tens of thousands of people are running their own servers for millions of users, and that's the fediverse/ActivityPub.

0
3
0

As said, tens of thousands of people are self-hosting *today*. Fediverse software doesn't just scale up, it scales *down*.

GotoSocial is cheap enough on resources where you can run it for family and friends on a raspberry pi or spare laptop you have sitting around.

0

Now you may be saying, "Christine, this is really unfair, because you're looking at ActivityPub servers which are only dealing with a small amount of the network, what if it were an ActivityPub mega-node? What are the costs THEN huh?" and "What if we hosted just PART of ATProto?"

What then INDEED

0

Now you're hitting the point in this thread where some of you may be thinking "aha! this is where Christine is saying that the fediverse/activitypub are awesome and atproto is terrible!"

you have NO IDEA HOW MUCH I CRITICIZE THE FEDIVERSE ALL THE TIME, I do it all the time, and will later here

0
0
0

And before we make it any further can I say that I watched a nice medley of David Bowie and Cher singing, and it was so lovely youtube.com/watch?v=KPlN8RBP-Ws

@mlemwebDr. Morgan Lemmer-Webber said "of course it's very heteronormative despite having two queer coded icons on the stage and ISN'T THAT THE WAY I guess

0

But where was I? Oh yes. We had talked about why PDS'es aren't enough (blog/google analogy), relative costs of hosting things on ATProto vs ActivityPub, etc etc

But we haven't gotten into the really interesting parts which are the structural analysis stuff, so let's move onto that

0

The thing you often get seen thrown around is "it's amazing, I had no idea a decentralized protocol could just work like that! How on earth did they solve that in a decentralized system and so FAST too!"

It's simple: all those things "just work" because Bluesky is centralized.

0

But here's the other thing. People have trouble with the fediverse! All those decentralization decisions get in the way, my god, you've got to choose a server, search doesn't work well (actually it could but it's a cultural thing, different topic), and worst of all:

Sometimes you DON'T SEE REPLIES!

0

So let me introduce two models of communication which we can use to analyze these two systems. It's important!

- Fediverse/ActivityPub: "message passing"
- Bluesky/ATProto: "shared heap"

Okay, cool, terms established, let's talk about them and why they matter because they matter A LOT

0
2
0
0
0
0

Here's my definition of federation:

> Federation: a technical approach to communication architecture which achieves decentralization by many independent nodes cooperating and communicating to be a unified whole, with no node holding more power than the responsibility or communication of its parts.

0
1
0