If mastodon.social carries on growing at the expense of others, the Fedi will soon be in danger, here's why: fedi.tips/its-a-really-bad-ide

At the same time, Mastodon's server devs are creating brilliant features to help decentralise the Fediverse. The v4.5.0 release will auto-federate all replies in threads, greatly helping smaller servers.

The good stuff will be pointless if mastodon.social keeps growing. It's as if Mastodon gGmbH isn't sure what it wants: does it want to build the world's only truly decentralised social network, or does it want to make a centralised social network which is structurally destined to enshittify?

2/4

This is NOT a difficult situation to solve.

There is a really easy solution: keep recommending one server for people who don't like choice, but regularly rotate it so growth is spread out. The app could have a button saying "Join mas.to" instead of "Join mastodon.social", for example.

The app makers could choose a pool of reliable general servers with track records going back many years (some are listed here: fedi.garden/servers-sorted-by-) and recommend one of these on the front page of the app. They could then regularly change which one is recommended, so that each one in the reliable pool gradually gets a share of new signups.

3/4

0
0
0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://social.chinwag.org/users/FediThing/statuses/115492130283097774 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)