Signal is open source, so our code is regularly scrutinized in addition to regular formal audits. We also constantly monitor security@signal.org for any new reports, and we act on them with quickness while also working to protect the people who rely on us from outside threats like phishing with warnings and safeguards.
This is why Signal remains the gold standard for private, secure communications. 5/
@signalappSignal But is it idiot-proof? Can you give examples on things that would be idiotic to do, which might undermine security of a top secret conversation?!
Would you say that it is compatible with the requirements of the US government to safeguard conversations for either legal or historical purposes? Or would that just be a really stupid use of the software?!
Please provide clear, verifiable examples of governmental user stupidity, thanks! π
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://mastodon.social/users/KraftTea/statuses/114225580034200341 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)
