Hackers' Pub

Syntax	Description	Examples
`"` keyword `"`	Finds the string within quotes, including spaces. Case-insensitive. (Escape quotes inside with `\"`)	`"Hackers' Pub"`
`from:` handle	Finds content written by the specified user.	`from:hongminhee` `from:hongminhee@hollo.social`
`lang:` ISO 639-1	Finds content written in the specified language.	`lang:en`
`#` tag	Finds content with the specified tag. Case-insensitive.	`#HackersPub`
condition condition	Finds content that satisfies both conditions on either side of the space (logical AND).	`"Hackers' Pub" lang:en`
condition `OR` condition	Finds content that satisfies at least one of the conditions on either side of the OR operator (logical OR).	`#HackersPub OR "Hackers' Pub" lang:en`
`(` condition `)`	Combines the operators within the parentheses first.	`(#HackersPub OR "Hackers' Pub" OR "Hackers Pub") lang:en`

STPo @STPo@mastodon.social

1/29/2026, 10:19:58 AM

Public

Vous reprendrez bien un peu de désinformation officielle ?
Vous serez ravi d’apprendre sur France Culture que @GargronEugen Rochko a quitté « son » réseau, et que c’est à cause de vous.

https://www.radiofrance.fr/franceculture/podcasts/un-monde-connecte/le-reseau-europeen-w-social-pense-comme-un-anti-x-a-t-il-une-chance-d-exister-4110325

Extrait d’un podcast France Cul sur W Social qui se termine par : « […] concernant le réseau décentralisé Mastodon, développé par un informaticien allemand, Eugen Rochko, ce dernier a déclaré quitter son propre réseau, fatigué entre autres par le comportement de certains utilisateurs. »

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://mastodon.social/users/STPo/statuses/115977879479030822 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)

Eugen Rochko @Gargron@mastodon.social

1/29/2026, 6:32:27 PM

Public

RE: https://mastodon.social/@STPo/115977879479030822

Excusez-moi?! I'm still on Mastodon, still working on Mastodon--I love it here. Seems like the journalist has now removed the paragraph from the article, but has not published a retraction, and the false statement is still in the audio version. Where did they get this idea from?