oh also, please consider all of the above part of my thorough derision for the trend of offloading thought to "AI"

I work with convnets professionally, I understand what they're useful for. "Thinking" ain't it, chief, and it never will be.

do I believe a "thinking" machine is possible? yes

do I believe a "thinking" machine can be bootstrapped by means of "baby's first dalliance with frequentism" and a morally, fiscally, and aesthetically bankrupt amount of brute-force computation? no

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://hachyderm.io/users/SnoopJ/statuses/116072349905976649 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)