earthling @appassionato@mastodon.social
Public

This is a clear case of US exceptionalism towards international law, of which there is a long history. It reflects a US view that its own laws prevail over all other law. According to the US, international law should not unduly limit its ability to advance its national interests.

It’s also based on an assumption that any international opprobium it may encounter can be managed or safely ignored.

theconversation.com/trumps-int


Trump’s intervention in Venezuela: the 3 warnings for the world

The Trump administration has used US domestic laws to justify capturing Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. It’s a clear case of US exceptionalism.

theconversation.com · The Conversation

Link author: The Conversation AU + NZ@theconversationau@mastodon.social

earthling @appassionato@mastodon.social
Public

US allies and partners need to be very aware of the ramifications of this exceptional US law enforcement practice.

If, down the line, the US military encounters a more robust response than it did in Venezuela, it could trigger NATO treaty obligations for European countries and Canada, and ANZUS treaty obligations for Australia.

So, if the US continues down this road, there’s every chance the consequences of its interventionism could be felt by many around the world.



0
0
0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://mastodon.social/users/appassionato/statuses/115842457254866198 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)