Most arguments about vibe-coding are just wrong. The problem isn't that natural language is imprecise but rather than natural language allows imprecision. This problem has been part of every step forward in the development of software engineering. We've seen it before and we know what to do. Vibe-coding can be made massively less random and less dangerous if we do what we've done before. Read the post for a full explanation.
https://mystack.wyman.us/p/the-next-turn-of-the-spiral-fixing?r=whf2
#vibe coding

May be a graphic of magazine and text that says 'The Next Turn of the Spiral: Fixing Vibe Coding Without Reinventing Software Engineering We've been here before. We know what to do. As May Think'
0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://threads.net/ap/users/17841406881541325/post/18098847145753807/ on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)