cancel (@cancel@merveilles.town)

(Reposted as unlisted to not pollute my instance's discovery with slop-related content) The US Supreme Court has declined to hear the AI copyright case. So, the new Copyright Office guidance that says the output of prompting systems that produce art, sound, text, etc., cannot be copyrighted, no matter how many times the human re-prompts or iterates the system, is upheld: https://www.theverge.com/policy/887678/supreme-court-ai-art-copyright (Guidance from Copyright Office: https://copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-2-Copyrightability-Report.pdf ) So, unless I'm misunderstanding something… 1) If your corporate codebase is written with AI, and it leaks to the public, too bad -- no copyright protections. People can take it and use it. 2) AI generated code is incompatible with GPL and GPL-like projects, because GPL requires copyright to be assigned in order to enforce the license. (Edit: only a problem if the project is 100% AI, since public domain can be mixed into GPL without problem.) Is that really what's happening? Am I misunderstanding something here?

merveilles.town · Merveilles