i had cause to think about the distinction between deep vs. shallow embeddings today for the first time in awhile and, as usual, my intuition gets them backwards. (the agreed-upon mapping seems to be shallow = "encode object language with corresponding meta-language constructs" and deep = "encode object language as uninterpreted data in the metalanguage".) why is it like this?
shitpost
why do they call it shallow embedding when you shallow embed the object syntax of deep metalanguage encode the syntax
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://hci.social/users/chrisamaphone/statuses/115889251820144002 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)