The obvious answer is copyleft-type licenses.

(1) Has anybody done legal analysis on that beyond the obvious? I don’t think LLM training on copyleft code has been tested in court yet…? (Even LLM training on more restrictively licensed works seems to be surviving court challenge….)

(2) Are there copyleft licenses (i.e. “derived works must be similarly licensed”) out there that don’t have the Stink of Stallman on them? Or is GPL v3 still just the way to go despite the smell?

2/2

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://hachyderm.io/users/datarama/statuses/116268031793649838 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)