With eight different flux transition times, we can start to draw with what are essentially "flux pixels". Fluxels? Flixcels?
We can't actually fit one pixel immediately above another - x always advances, but the perceptual density is high enough on the x-axis that it appears as if we have a raster display.
But we can improve this.
If we add random jitter around our target flux period, we can make our "fluxels" thicker.
This, I think, is a new form of steganography. The data is meaningless and unreadable. But it would appear in a visualization tool, like HxC, Applesauce, or FluxFox.
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://oldbytes.space/users/gloriouscow/statuses/115526620590582706 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)
