These are the only bases in which I know it’s possible for the reciprocal of an integer to have a repeating block of digits with every digit exactly once.

I proved this is never true for odd bases, but it’s not clear to me if there’s a simple way to rule out any other bases.

My web page on this: gregegan.net/SCIENCE/Reptends/

There’s an OEIS page that answers a different question: if we don’t care if some of the digits appear more than once in the reptend, what is the smallest integer that has a pandigital reptend in each base?

oeis.org/A382498

Smallest integers whose reciprocals have non-redundant pandigital reptends
Base 2 1/3 = 0.(01)_2 ...
Base 4 1/34 = 0.0(0132)_4 ...
Base 6 1/93 = 0.0(021534)_6 ...
Base 10 1/72,728 = 0.000(0137498625) ...
Base 12 1/12,560 = 0.00(01798A2654B3)_12 ...
Base 14 1/28,784,914,432 = 0.000000000A09(7DAC59B6031842)_14 ...
Base 18 1/82,703,547,776 = 0.0000000(02731C6D8HFAEG5B49)_18 ...
Base 20 1/2,188,281,250 = 0.0000000B(DJ98CIF5HG60AB714E23)_20 ...
Base 30 1/17,344 = 0.001GL1(ONRA8PKEBM0QH1D562JL49FI7T3CSG)_30 ...
0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://mathstodon.xyz/users/gregeganSF/statuses/114380260760571780 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)