Engineering-infused approaches to analyzing disasters are interesting, but imho, miss a lot. They frequently land on explanations like, "people don't voice dissenting opinions."

Ok, well, modern theories about how and WHY dissenting opinions do get voiced from inside of groups is more complex than that. I am tired of "groupthink" explanations that don't incorporate key features of the environment, and yeah, that includes being real about the disasters we're analyzing when they're white & male

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://mastodon.social/users/grimalkina/statuses/114687979696131860 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)