Engineering-infused approaches to analyzing disasters are interesting, but imho, miss a lot. They frequently land on explanations like, "people don't voice dissenting opinions."
Ok, well, modern theories about how and WHY dissenting opinions do get voiced from inside of groups is more complex than that. I am tired of "groupthink" explanations that don't incorporate key features of the environment, and yeah, that includes being real about the disasters we're analyzing when they're white & male
Like, analyzing a specific managerial chain in a field that literally keeps itself segregated for decades? You think that doesn't include certain rules? Come on, that's not universal human laws of communication that represent all human beings, if you are willing to get SITUATED with the specific toxicities of a management chain in a given place why aren't you comfortable getting situated with the cultural baggage that structure brings in?
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://mastodon.social/users/grimalkina/statuses/114687987055427469 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)
