1/ I wonder how the courts will square the circle when someone shoots an ICE or Border Patrol agent stating they had the right to do so under the 2A against the backdrop of laws and consequences of shooting federal agents.

Since the 2A advocates will argue the entire point of having the right to bear arms is to protect oneself from government tyranny.

What happens when someone actually does that?

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://my-spaces.social/users/hasani/statuses/115979464871990433 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)