It'll be interesting to see what happens when a company pisses off an employee to the point where that person creates a public repo containing all the company's AI-generated code. I guarantee what's AI-generated and what's human-written isn't called out anywhere in the code, meaning the entire codebase becomes public domain.

While the company may have recourse based on the employment agreement (which varies in enforceability by state), I doubt there'd be any on the basis of copyright.

FWIW I'm not a lawyer and I'm not recommending that you do this. ๐Ÿ˜„ Even if companies have no legal standing on copyright, their legal team will try it. It *will* cost you money.

But man, oh man, I'm gonna have popcorn ready for when someone inevitably pulls this move.

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://zomglol.wtf/users/jamie/statuses/116059593870764508 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)