is there a critique of that Knuth article? lots of people are gushing about it just b/c it's him, but I'm not familiar enough with its subject matter to tell if it's legit. however, stuff like this feels really off:
"Filip Stappers tested Claude’s Python program for all odd m between 3 and 101, finding perfect decompositions each time. Thus he concluded, quite reasonably, that the problem was indeed solved for odd values of m."
like, that's not how maths works