When noting biases toward the cultural differences behind the sorts of female or male connectors, one should presume equality behind the diverse groups and instead start fostering inclusivity for the various genders of connectors. Historically, the inequalities were often due to the polarization decisions made in their design, some of which were granted privilege due to socioeconomic influences brought about by systemic decisions early in the design phase. The perceived barriers excluded many minority connector types and even some political actions to enforce standards lead to an under representation of connector types. Historically, this lead newer, more efficient connectors to have the status of victims of prejudice by established institutional boards.