@maccathKaty TransWomenAreWomen Ereira 
@dbu 
@GirgiasGina Peter Banyard 
@jrf_nlJuliette 
@derickrDerick Rethans It has explicitly been stated in the PR that an RFC is require for it to go anywhere (including labeling it as such).
I expect anyone that is (still) engaging with the PR to do it in full knowledge of the procedures. The handful of remarks made there would equally (need to) be made as part of the RFC discussion to determine the desired semantics.
@timwollaTim Düsterhus Reviewing a PR which should never have been created, let alone considered, is the same as "feeding the trolls".
It also leaves the impression that:
a) the PHP project is seriously considering the code for inclusion (otherwise, why review?)
b) creating a PoC for a feature using an LLM is acceptable in the PHP project (which it shouldn't be IMO - PoCs too often end of up in a project instead of being thrown away and it legitimizes theft)
/cc @maccathKaty TransWomenAreWomen Ereira @dbu @GirgiasGina Peter Banyard @derickrDerick Rethans
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://phpc.social/users/jrf_nl/statuses/116154574801209520 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)