Considering this post is going viral here and boosted by Mastodon's ceo:
What is mastodon.social's policy if it had received the same takedown request?
Meaning if an account on mastodon.social was ordered to be taken down by a Turkish judge 'under Article 8/A of Law No. 5651, citing “national security and public order.”'
More context on the request: https://bianet.org/haber/x-users-in-turkey-migrate-to-bluesky-amid-censorship-306189
@laurenshof 
@GargronEugen Rochko 
@andypiper
The difference here is that there is no ‘one’ Mastodon. So it would be much harder to control the presence of people on the Fediverse than with Bluesky.
And I think exactly this is the message that can be learned from this article: a true social and federated approach, the way the Fediverse works is superior to the centralized approach that Bluesky uses.
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://procolix.social/users/koen/statuses/114347318290605165 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)
