you'll be surprised that, because copyright doesn't reserve the right to run programs exclusively to the copyright holder, copyright licensing (= granting permissions) cannot withhold or delimit that right. there are some clueless license writers fooling themselves and others purporting to have copyleft-like licenses that do this, but all this shows is that they understand neither copyright nor copyleft

the other fundamental problem is that the entire notion of software freedom is that the developers/authors/copyright holders should not have power over users. controlling others through the software they use, even if for a good cause, amounts to unjust power, and such power shouldn't be available. (it also divides the community on what should be ruled out, which is a great way to weaken a social movement)

now, I understand and share the wish to promote socially just causes, and to stop injustice. the way to achieve justice is not to take it on your own hands, imposing your wish onto others by whatever means you can manage. that leads to absolute rule by the most powerful, and I'm sure you're not going to enjoy that. the way to promote social change and achieve justice is by democratically instituted and enforced prohibitions of antisocial unjust behaviors