They're conning statistically unsophisticated, disappointed voters with impressive-looking, but meaningless, "analysis" that tell people what they want to believe.
If you push back, they challenge you to prove a negative - "if this is wrong, just show there WASN'T fraud".
That's not how it works. That's not how any of this works.
There ARE real vulnerabilities in some of our election infrastructure, and this is absolutely a problem that we should fix (and on which significant progress has been made). But the mere existence of vulnerabilities is not evidence of fraud.
Always be skeptical of those telling you what you want to hear.
7/
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://federate.social/users/mattblaze/statuses/115538252660500355 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)
