@mcc
@cwebberChristine Lemmer-Webber The original post was all about an LLM taking non-deterministic shell level actions at runtime. And you conflated that with deterministic code written by an LLM.
What I wrote is very relevant.
@mcc
@cwebberChristine Lemmer-Webber The original post was all about an LLM taking non-deterministic shell level actions at runtime. And you conflated that with deterministic code written by an LLM.
What I wrote is very relevant.
@dandylyonsDaniel Lyons
@cwebberChristine Lemmer-Webber it is about an attack based on covertly deploying LLM development tools, with the possible intent of later using them to leverage a second stage attack. If the LLM development tools were already installed, installing openclaw would not have been necessary and the attack could have worked a different way. We are discussing a situation where *the developer of a piece of software I use merely having LLM tools on their computer represents a risk to me*
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://mastodon.social/users/mcc/statuses/116178428775421836 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)