One thing about "AI" is with the technology OpenAI has (large neural network plus manual tagging) you could've made the best search engine ever. There could be a Copilot where you describe what you wanted and it finds an example of it in the corpus of open source software. You could go from a fuzzy image description to a stock image. These would be better than buggy code and fucked up images. But they wouldn't do that because the *service* OpenAI provides is obscuring that the content is stolen.
Not sure when you've used #AI πproperlyπ.
In my experience the more vocal opponent of AI is the further back in time their (lack of use) goes.
With the most ardent opponents having never used the models, yet having most empathic (and increasingly inaccurate) opinions.
Attached media, a public query from today, with sources dropdown at the bottom.
Approx 30% of web searches comes from the engines nowadays.
(Edit: Hahaha, insta blocked by poster, I guess folks don't like to be called out on saying patent provable falsehoods π€‘
The poster, made a comment exposing their ignorance of features of existing AI. This one has 33,000 followers, question is "How many others like them have zero idea about the systems they critique"?)
#llm #ai #luddites
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://infosec.exchange/users/n_dimension/statuses/115663288814632634 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)