@cwebberChristine Lemmer-Webber @nataliyakosmyna
Caveat. It's a preprint.
Not peer reviewed yet.
I'm not rejecting it outright like many AI papers for flawed methodology.
Intuitively I'm sceptical of the brainwave analysis. I have to read the full paper how it was measured.
One interpretation might be that the LLM users were chill about what they were doing having confidence in their tool.
THINK HARDER seems like a hard deal to sell.
Human civilization is driven by less effort, not more.
@n_dimensionWulfy @cwebberChristine Lemmer-Webber it is a preprint indeed! My first one, to be honest (two other papers on arxiv under my profile were not submitted by myself), and I see your points about the preprints, I also prefer the papers to be peer-reviewed first! But I felt like in 6-8 months (best case!), when the paper will undergo the peer reviews, some policymaker will already decide to fully vote in favor of LLM to be integrated in all kindergartens across the country.
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://mastodon.social/users/nataliyakosmyna/statuses/114699171079799678 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)
