Microsoft is using AI to replace all their C/C++ code with Rust by 2030. Is that actually possible? What could go wrong? Microsoft’s strategy relies on a new "North Star" metric: 1 engineer, 1 month, 1 million lines of code. 😱

linkedin.com/posts/galenh_prin

Rust is good, but this approach seems incredibly difficult. Given the risk of AI hallucinations, aiming for a million lines of code per developer feels like an 'Apollo-program' level of difficulty and an excessive task 😱

A screenshot of a LinkedIn post by Galen Hunt, a Microsoft employee. The post details a goal to eliminate every line of C and C++ from Microsoft by 2030 by using AI and algorithmic infrastructure to translate large codebases into Rust at a scale of "1 engineer, 1 month, 1 million lines of code."

Many similar projects failed within months when big banks tried to replace COBOL with modern stacks like Java. Even today, IBM is working hard to promote AI use cases for translating massive legacy codebases to modern alternatives, yet there are very few takers because banking or financial institutions are highly regulated and losing people’s money is a significant risk and bad press waiting to happen.

0
0
0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://mastodon.social/users/nixCraft/statuses/115767305082553232 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)