If you use an AI-generated image for your article/post, this indicates to me you might have also used AI-generated text.

If you use AI-generated text for your article/post then:

1- I have no idea if you verified the veracity of any claimed facts.

2- I have no idea what your own voice is.

3- I have no idea if this truly expresses your own views, and if you even cared to read it.

4- I have no idea what your intention is with this, other than exploiting my attention and clicks with the least amount of efforts on your part.

5- This shows me you have no respect at all for the labour that was stolen to build these tools, exploiting millions of artists and writers to make billions of dollars without any compensation to them whatsoever.

Why would I want to engage with any content like that?

• I don't want to communicate with a machine (I can do that by myself).

• I don't want to participate in this disgusting exploitation of artists and writers.

• And I want to communicate with another human, of course.

If your intention isn't to communicate with another human, then stop deceiving them making them think they are :no_ai:

@Em0nM4stodonEm :official_verified: Ages ago a colleague posted something on linked in that was AI generated and he was talking about how great it was. So I read it and pointed out a bunch of obvious mistakes and gaps. Rather than engage with that, he generated some AI bullshit response to me and posted that. I stopped engaging.

If I wanted ChatGPT’s opinion on something I can type the question myself. I do not need an educated person to set aside all their education, type into the chat bot and copy/paste its response. I could do that my damn self if that’s what I wanted. I don’t need a typing assistant.

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://infosec.exchange/users/paco/statuses/115822196394435389 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)