it's hilarious how a very small number of people have been in my mentions trying to argue that actually vibecoding is the future of programming, the next iteration of abstraction...
bruh, you only think that because you don't give a shit. you're not doing coding at a higher level of abstraction, that would require abstraction to even occur. you're asking a fancy markov chain to output slop in the shape of a program and calling it work.
and it's only even taken on because so many programmers don't give a shit about producing code with 6 finger hands and almost-legible letters. it compiles and doesn't immediately crash, don't it?
as it turns out, all the people doing language research to figure out ways of reducing bugs by construction have been working on the wrong fucking problem! step one is not "how do we make it harder to accidentally create bugs" but "how do we make it so anyone cares whether or not a bug exists?"
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://social.treehouse.systems/users/pikhq/statuses/116186071968246089 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)