@rakoo @ricciRob Ricci have a read of Lauren's article: connectedplaces.online/where-d

Yes, community on AT Protocol is a nascent concept still, but the separation of identity + data from applications makes it possible to experiment and have one social graph or many.

One project doing community spaces on AT Protocol is: github.com/collectivesocial/op

@thisismissemEmelia ๐Ÿ‘ธ๐Ÿป @ricciRob Ricci

yes, if we're looking at mastodon and the model it has created that all microblogging apps have copied, then community doesn't really exist in the technical parts but must be artificially built up. The more interesting example is the threadiverse where communities are literal spaces: people congregate towards one or any number, they are independent from your server and from your identity. This, to me, feels closer to how communities start to create: pick an obvious topic, make obvious-y rules about what is on-topic or not to guide what people can talk about, then possibly graduate from there to another form (maybe a specific, closed community with your people). I do think more visibility should be given to the threadiverse rather than microblogging, or even mastodon, because of all the problems you have listed. And the future direction of AP should definitely split the server from the usage and build apps on the client only !
0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://blah.rako.space/objects/9147e35e-f218-49e2-a830-e08c8c0e7fa7 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)