rant, California

The problem was never about parental control nor the children. This has always been about getting as much information as possible from the end-user. Giving away personal information such as your age, gender, your eye color, and your preferences, JUST TO USE YOUR HARDWARE, should never be made into law, period.

Do you seriously think that just because California does not require national ID for age verification
today means that they are innocent? Do you seriously not have any clue about the fact that the government in UK is now making the end-user upload their national ID to third-party companies for accessing any site with *potential* adult content like Twitter and Deviantart? We have already past pornhub long ago; this has never been about stopping stupid teenagers watching pornhub to begin with. No. This has always been about obtaining end-user information since day one. And I disagree with users claiming that giving up your personal information (age, gender, preferences) as an end-user is the path for good future when I see the glimpse of PSYCHO-PASS Dystopia already.

RE: https://infosec.exchange/users/david_chisnall/statuses/116160637051672728

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://kawane.misskey.online/notes/ajdhk33nfb on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)