A friend, @chloetankahhui陳佳慧 AgeVerificationHater 🏳️‍⚧️ has been speaking up against the proposal to enforce age verification at the OS level, and the QRTs to this shows the extent of naivety that a lot of people have.

No one who does hardware security believes that any system is bulletproof, but do you really think that circumventing these things will always be a simple firmware mod or hardware hack?

Let's dive in. /1

Screenshot of tweet: 

people saying "they can't force Linux to do age verification!! it's open source!!" are being incredibly naive

the next step is locking bootloaders/BIOS at the hardware level and every computer only capable of running approved OSes with age verification
0
7
3

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://chaos.social/users/sleepyowl/statuses/116126002122086149 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)

Again, there is no "age verification", there is only "identity verification", and "identity verification at the OS level" means specifically that there is no such thing as free software in any inclusive, democratic sense and no such thing as "computer ownership" in any way that involves meaningful choice.

chaos.social/@sleepyowl/116126

0
1
0
0

RE: chaos.social/@sleepyowl/116126

A must read thread from @sleepyowlSchrödinger's Catgirl (Joyce), particularly for anyone laughing off the "oh they're trying to enforce age verification at an OS level, well I'll just change my open source operating system settings"

Y'all, this is the game where we get LOCKED OUT of having ANY real FOSS operating system we control AT ALL

The steps have been being put in place for this for over a decade now. And who controls the supply chain?

We have to fight this stuff tooth and nail.

0
25
0