@rysiekMichał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦
@samirsamir, 60% aloo, 40% rage ... except by fracturing. what often happens at that point is things break into new communities that figure out their own paths, trying their best to carry forward the good stuff and respond to the bad stuff. it sucks starting over, and it's not that it works great, but it's been an important backstop for all recorded history, you know?
@ireneistaIrenes (many)
@rysiekMichał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦
@samirsamir, 60% aloo, 40% rage
"Community" is this interesting notion. A word that is all too often too easily and hand-wavingly applied, without a clear conception of what it entails and the different expectations people have wrt their own role, commitments, and level of participation.
A group of people must give meaning to the word explicitly, to be able to form the community they want and need, and can subsequently uphold, sustain, and evolve it. This is almost never addressed properly, and where due attention to governance is given, the nature of the (usually top-down) governance model is such, that they only work up to a certain scale without getting serious issues around power dynamics. You see large-scale orgs getting into drama's or move into very formal governance, adopting models from the corporate world.
https://coding.social focuses on formation of overarching chaordic organization that fits smaller organizational structures, like communities, at healthy sustainable scales.
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://social.coop/users/smallcircles/statuses/116272770047270678 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)
