We should talk about Werner Koch's response gpg.fail on the oss-security mailing list.

openwall.com/lists/oss-securit

Yes, and actually the only serious bug from their list.

Koch either didn't watch the talk, he is in such defense of his own ego that he can't see how serious the bugs were, or he's tacitly admitting that PGP is not a serious recommendation.

Can you distinguish between these three explanations?

Could it be all of them are true?

Impact

While this may allow remote code execution (RCE), it definitively causes memory corruption.

Good research.

I think this sarcastic quip is what reveals Werner Koch's opinion about the security researchers and their work.

The rest of his email is measured (and partly responding to other mailing list participants rather than the disclosure directly).

I think 2026 should be the year that we make PGP irrelevant.

Not just GnuPG (Koch's implementation), but the entire OpenPGP ecosystem.

Most cryptographers I talk to gave up on PGP over a decade ago.

(After seeing the arrogance and dismissiveness that bled through Koch's oss-security email, who can blame them?)

If you're a country whose government mandates the use of PGP, even in obscure places, let's talk about how to replace PGP.

0
0
0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://furry.engineer/users/soatok/statuses/115808748322802252 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)