@sollerJeremy Soller 🦀
I think they've effectively stated that no software license is enforceable since you can't really prove if code is LLM generated or not (unless you explicitly state that it is).
What prevents one from uploading AI with no explicit indication that it's AI? Or does that get treated as if the "developer" wrote it themselves?
@zmF Copyright is enforced on a case by case basis, and in the absence of evidence it would be assumed that all rights are reserved by whoever is determined to be the original author. This also applies nearly universally via the Berne Convention: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention
However, what I am seeing is that large open source projects are readily accepting changes that are clearly marked as AI generated. If it is clear there is no human author, then there is no copyright protection.
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://floss.social/users/soller/statuses/116217475054039468 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)
