Turned on the new #GitHub "Code Quality" feature that seems to be some extended CodeQL + AI.
It's actually worse than anything #SonarQube gave us. That actually gave really good reports on code smells, regressions and coverage failure. It was reliable.
It really does appear tech companies are replacing everything with expensive, resource intensive systems that give worse results and expect us to pay more 
@pluralisticCory Doctorow #enshitificaton
If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://tane.codes/users/tanepiper/statuses/115674333918638273 on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)
@sijmensijmen (holiday stress mode) 
@shadowwwind 
@bagderdaniel:// stenberg:// My concern here that LLMs do give worse-than results than something like Sonar - in many cases *static* code analysis was good enough to catch things that LLMs miss.
Ideally we would still use different tools, but GitHub seems to want to push everything into models.
