Martin Seeger (@masek@infosec.exchange)

@phreaknerd@social.tchncs.de @isotopp Agreed, but this cuts 90+% of the financing. So the algorithms have to become simpler and less data intensive. So the balance will be at a better point. Another idea I had a long time ago: > If an algorithm shows you a post you didn't subscribe to, the owner of the algorithm becomes fully responsible (financially and legal) for the content of said post as if he were the editor. This would add another balance point with the algorithm having to assess dangers of a post in comparison to it's potential use.

infosec.exchange · Infosec Exchange