The important part of this is not that AI can be good at craft—but that, as Hollis says, no amount of craft will make us feel a model has written a “great” poem. AI keeps revealing that we care about human action, not about the abstractions (intelligence, creativity) we invented to describe it. +

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:2swfvxtdfegcwxc6tnyczjo3/post/3mbvvfiso3s2p

0

If you have a fediverse account, you can quote this note from your own instance. Search https://bsky.brid.gy/convert/ap/at://did:plc:565ebob5f6hw33hjdkxty6qj/app.bsky.feed.post/3mbwem6vjbs2u on your instance and quote it. (Note that quoting is not supported in Mastodon.)

I've been saying for a while that our inability to measure or value these models' lack of a viewpoint/theory-of-own-mind/rich internal goal and value structure will be the shoals a lot of the more "creative" outputs break on.

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:565ebob5f6hw33hjdkxty6qj/post/3mbwem6vjbs2u


The value-destroying potential...

0